2018
DOI: 10.1007/s11548-018-1754-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Automatic planning of needle placement for robot-assisted percutaneous procedures

Abstract: The introduced planning method helped us prove that it is possible to use such a "general purpose" redundant manipulator equipped with a dedicated tool to perform percutaneous interventions in cluttered spaces like a CT gantry.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
9
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
1
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Considering a normal clinical workflow without interfering guide needles and the need for an evaluation CT, even more than the 89.5 % success rate in completed insertions could be feasible. The reported 3D deviation of 7.19±4.22 mm and a lateral deviation of 5.12±3.39 mm that we report is comparable to similar systems (3D deviation usually ranging from 3 mm to 10 mm [13], [15], [30], [32], [33]). However, there are fundamental differences in the setup and biopsy sampling procedure of these systems that influence needle placement accuracy.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Considering a normal clinical workflow without interfering guide needles and the need for an evaluation CT, even more than the 89.5 % success rate in completed insertions could be feasible. The reported 3D deviation of 7.19±4.22 mm and a lateral deviation of 5.12±3.39 mm that we report is comparable to similar systems (3D deviation usually ranging from 3 mm to 10 mm [13], [15], [30], [32], [33]). However, there are fundamental differences in the setup and biopsy sampling procedure of these systems that influence needle placement accuracy.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…Furthermore, runtime of the system never exceeded 10 s during our evaluation compared to up to 25 s which the system of Ebert et al could need if insertions were not possible with one orientation. Belbachir et al report over 40 s planning time [30]. Reducing the resolution of the CT or grid size of robot feasibility evaluation decreases runtime but may lead to inaccurate heat maps.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous work in stereotactic automatic planning has been presented for Deep Brain Stimulation (DBS) [16], needle biopsy [17], [18], SEEG [19], [20] and other straight-access neurosurgical interventions [21], [22]. For procedures where only the tip is active (e.g., DBS, needle biopsy, or laser ablation) a common approach is to compute the optimal entry point given the desired target defined by the user.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The reported time was below a minute for 7-12 electrode plans. Regarding alternative path computations, results are displayed with a color-coding directly on the skull surface, similarly to other tools published for DBS [26], needle biopsy [17], [18], and general keyhole neurological interventions [21], [27]- [29].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The grid method is also a common method for robot path planning research, and can be combined with a variety of methods to path the robot (Schiavina et al 2018). The researchers carried out a deeper planning on the grid method based on the grid method of the robot motion space, and finally successfully completed the path planning for the soccer robot (Belbachir et al 2018). The neural network method is an iterative solution path planning method.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%