1966
DOI: 10.1109/proc.1966.5249
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Automatic photointerpretation and target location

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

1968
1968
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…images, (2) Holmes double-gated detector [10,11], and (3) rejection of "large" targets. Since two of the three targets are not visible in most of the images for the latter case, the probability of detection cannot be much higher than 1/3.…”
Section: Spreading Errorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…images, (2) Holmes double-gated detector [10,11], and (3) rejection of "large" targets. Since two of the three targets are not visible in most of the images for the latter case, the probability of detection cannot be much higher than 1/3.…”
Section: Spreading Errorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Blank cells are ignored. This type of filter was originally successfully used for detection of aircraft in aerial photographs (Holmes, 1966).…”
Section: 6)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, converting a continuous-tone picture into a set of black blobs on a white background, with the black blobs approximating a connected range of the gray scale, often requires a combination of convolutions and thresholding operations [1]. The outlining and smoothing of the edges of the blobs are also usually implemented by sequences of thrcsholded convolutions [2,3].…”
Section: Inh'oductionmentioning
confidence: 99%