2013
DOI: 10.1109/ted.2013.2270975
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Automatic Optimization of a Klystron Interaction Structure

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…be transported distances up to 20 cm without a guiding magnetic field. To work with the pseudospark-sourced pulsed electron beam, automatic optimization techniques can be used to shorten the klystron interaction structure [9]. An alternative technique is to use the extended interaction oscillator (EIO) circuit, which has the advantages of high interaction impedance and high gain per unit length [10].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…be transported distances up to 20 cm without a guiding magnetic field. To work with the pseudospark-sourced pulsed electron beam, automatic optimization techniques can be used to shorten the klystron interaction structure [9]. An alternative technique is to use the extended interaction oscillator (EIO) circuit, which has the advantages of high interaction impedance and high gain per unit length [10].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The bandwidth B is selected as objective 2 and defined as (15). The length of the interaction structure Ltot is selected as objective 3 and described as (16).…”
Section: B Optimization Algorithmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Christopher James Lingwood et al used a multiobjective genetic algorithm to globally optimize a klystron, with a focus on efficiency and tube length. The effectiveness of the algorithm was verified by comparing the optimized parameters with those of the B-factor klystron developed by Stanford Linear Accelerator Center [16]. However, only two objectives were optimized, whereas oscillators may have multiple design objectives that constrain each other.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The optimization process is automated using an evolutionary algorithm [12]. The first design features six cavities, to explore the potential of the klystron upconverter; the second consists of three cavities, with the aim of demonstrating the concept experimentally, using a 35 GHz input driver.…”
Section: Design and Optimization Of The Interaction Regionmentioning
confidence: 99%