2018
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-89743-1_18
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Automatic Ontology Learning from Heterogeneous Relational Databases: Application in Alimentation Risks Field

Abstract: In this paper, we propose a semantic approach for automatic ontology learning from heterogeneous relational databases in order to facilitate their integration. The semantic enrichment of heterogeneous databases, which cover the same domain, is essential to integrate them. Our approach is based on Wordnet and Wup's measure for measuring the semantic similarity between elements of these databases. It is described by a detailed process that can allow not only the generation of ontology but also its evolution as t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Based on the aforementioned criteria, we classified the ontology learning approaches as shown in Table 1. The comparative table shows that a large number of approaches, such as those in [4,5,[10][11][12][13][14][15][16], have a single input format. For example, Volker and Niepert [11] built an ontology from LOD (DBpedia).…”
Section: Comparison and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Based on the aforementioned criteria, we classified the ontology learning approaches as shown in Table 1. The comparative table shows that a large number of approaches, such as those in [4,5,[10][11][12][13][14][15][16], have a single input format. For example, Volker and Niepert [11] built an ontology from LOD (DBpedia).…”
Section: Comparison and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, almost all approaches aimed to return one or a few specific learning elements. For example, Booshehri and Luksch [5] extracted only non-taxonomic relations, while Aggoune [15] included four learning elements such as concepts, non-taxonomic relations, datatype properties, and individuals. In contrast to these common approaches, we cover the six different kinds of learning elements that can be appended to a learned ontology.…”
Section: Comparison and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Recently in [16], the authors used machine learning techniques. They proposed a semantic approach to automatically generate ontology from heterogeneous relational databases.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the automatic learning is a difficult task that has several important limitations with respect to the thesis objectives and research questions as pointed out in Table 3.4 First, the type of input requirements varies from one approach to another. Some approaches use unstructured texts as their input [Booshehri andLuksch, 2015, Sbissi et al, 2020], while others are concerned with structured data [Aggoune, 2018, Kuntarto et al, 2019. However, we notice that all reviewed approaches [Yao et al, 2014, Booshehri and Luksch, 2015, Aggoune, 2018, Sbissi et al, 2020] have a single input format.…”
Section: Comparison and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%