2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.dsr2.2016.03.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Automatic oil slick detection from SAR images: Results and improvements in the framework of the PRIMI pilot project

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 72 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Differently from optical sensors, SAR allows the obtaining of all weather and daynight 2D images of the illuminated area of the Earth's surface [3]. SAR remote sensing for ocean, seas and coastal applications mostly exploits the amplitude of the backscattered signal for, for example, monitoring oil-spills [4] and sea-ice [5], ship detection [6] and high-resolution wind fields retrieval [7]. However, SAR uses coherent radiation and the complementary information carried in the phase of the received complex signal can be also exploited.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Differently from optical sensors, SAR allows the obtaining of all weather and daynight 2D images of the illuminated area of the Earth's surface [3]. SAR remote sensing for ocean, seas and coastal applications mostly exploits the amplitude of the backscattered signal for, for example, monitoring oil-spills [4] and sea-ice [5], ship detection [6] and high-resolution wind fields retrieval [7]. However, SAR uses coherent radiation and the complementary information carried in the phase of the received complex signal can be also exploited.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, despite the high quality of freely available coastline databases, they cannot be directly applied to satellite images as the images have often been georeferenced using only the coordinates of the four image corners without ground control points (Biamino et al, 2015; Greidanus et al, 2004; Trivero et al, 2016). Therefore, the geo-positioning of the satellite images has limited accuracy and results in image shifts in the azimuth direction, and a consequent displacement of the land mask resulting in shifting of shorelines from the actual coastline and associated false alarms near the coast (Biamino et al, 2015; Greidanus et al, 2004; Trivero et al, 2016). On the other hand, commonly available land masks usually have accuracy limitations with small islands, intertidal areas and coastal man-made constructions leading to false alarms (Greidanus et al, 2004).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Unfortunately, besides the relatively high cost and a non-negligible rate of false alarms due to the variation of wind conditions, the presence of look-alikes, etc., the main limitation of SAR systems within an operational continuous monitoring system is represented by their low revisiting time, ranging from several days to dozens of days at mid-latitudes [13][14][15][16]. Even the full implementation of the COSMO-SkyMed satellite mission (an Italian mission with both military and civilian purposes) with four X-band SAR satellites in constellation [17] failed to guarantee an observation frequency suitable for operational surveillance activities.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%