2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.media.2012.10.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Automatic multimodal 2D/3D breast image registration using biomechanical FEM models and intensity-based optimization

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
63
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 69 publications
(63 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
63
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The registration method is based on a method originally developed for the registration of Magnetic Resonance Tomography images with X-ray mammograms [9,22] and was successfully applied for the registration of USCT images with X-ray mammograms. The obtained accuracy for an automated registration (TRE 11.9 mm) is slightly better than for the registration with MRI images (13.2 mm), well within the range other MRI-to-mammography registration approaches in literature [20,51] and as well in a range which might assist radiologists in multimodal diagnosis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The registration method is based on a method originally developed for the registration of Magnetic Resonance Tomography images with X-ray mammograms [9,22] and was successfully applied for the registration of USCT images with X-ray mammograms. The obtained accuracy for an automated registration (TRE 11.9 mm) is slightly better than for the registration with MRI images (13.2 mm), well within the range other MRI-to-mammography registration approaches in literature [20,51] and as well in a range which might assist radiologists in multimodal diagnosis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However it depends on a number of parameters for the preprocessing, the creation of the biomechanical model and both deformation simulation steps, which influence the registration accuracy. As an optional add-on to adapt these parameters to patient specific conditions, an optimization via image similarity similar to [9] is implemented. The image similarity S is calculated between the projection of the deformed USCT volume image and the corresponding mammogram.…”
Section: Image Registrationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…has been used extensively to model breast deformations and compression, including use for breast augmentation, 8,9 multimodality registration, [10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18] image-guided surgery, [19][20][21] and tumor tracking. 22,23 Several studies have tracked landmarks to within 5 mm.…”
Section: B Finite-element (Fe) Breast Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…15,24 Other studies have also included the effects of gravity. 9,21,22,25 Current state-of-the-art methods often optimize the initial breast position 16 and/or material parameters [16][17][18]20 through a FE-registration framework. Registrations, between breast MR images at different levels of compression, have also been used to provide boundary constraints to define the displacement of the region posterior to the compression plates in a corresponding FE model.…”
Section: B Finite-element (Fe) Breast Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%