IGARSS '98. Sensing and Managing the Environment. 1998 IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing. Symposium Proceedings. 1998
DOI: 10.1109/igarss.1998.691633
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Automatic moving targets detection using a rule-based system: comparison between different study cases

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

1998
1998
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In a previous work [3] has been presented as application the ships and wakes detection. Since the parameterisation is a difficult point in this kind of systems, we perform some tests, particularly we evaluate the probabilities of detection and test the rules parameterisation, using different images with different geometric resolutions [4]. The developed demonstrator implements a set of rules in a hierarchical order, that is all the pixels or the objects discarded in a previous step will be not considered in the following.…”
Section: Demonstrator Architecture Evolutionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In a previous work [3] has been presented as application the ships and wakes detection. Since the parameterisation is a difficult point in this kind of systems, we perform some tests, particularly we evaluate the probabilities of detection and test the rules parameterisation, using different images with different geometric resolutions [4]. The developed demonstrator implements a set of rules in a hierarchical order, that is all the pixels or the objects discarded in a previous step will be not considered in the following.…”
Section: Demonstrator Architecture Evolutionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since last year the developed SW has been tested on different images acquired at different time and having different resolution (multilook images) [4]. From the analysis of the results the SW has shown some weak points especially in the ship like pixels detection.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Most ship detection systems require land masking, where the land areas are omitted from the images being processed. Employing registration [6] and coastline detection methods [7], land masking is intended to eliminate the adverse effect caused by land. Many preprocessing methods, such as speckle filtering, aim to improve the facility and accuracy of subsequent stages.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The speckle filters are recommended as a preprocessing step by Ferrara et al in their ship detection work [4,5]. Prescreening, also known as the detection step, is the core of the ship detection algorithm, and constant false alarm rate (CFAR)-based methods are the most widely used approaches for the detection phase.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%