Conference Proceedings. IEEE Canadian Conference on Electrical and Computer Engineering (Cat. No.98TH8341)
DOI: 10.1109/ccece.1998.682551
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Automatic modulation type recognition

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
6
0

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The overall recognition rate of these algorithms over 97% when SNR=10dB. Druckmann et al in [5] suggested algorithm to discriminate between analogue modulated signals (AM, FM, DSB and SSB). The overall recognition rate of this algorithm reached 95% at SNR>10dB.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The overall recognition rate of these algorithms over 97% when SNR=10dB. Druckmann et al in [5] suggested algorithm to discriminate between analogue modulated signals (AM, FM, DSB and SSB). The overall recognition rate of this algorithm reached 95% at SNR>10dB.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This has motivated the researcher to develop various digital modulation identification methods [1][2][3]. As the adaptive receiver can communicate with different communication standards like TDMA, CDMA and GSM, the identification of digital modulation type of a signal is to be optimized.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The simulation for various methodologies was also carried out and reported. Modulation scheme recognition using the signal envelop method was described by Druckmann et al [3]. Lopatka et al [4] also adopted the approach incorporating fuzzy classification for 4DPSK, 16QAM and FSK schemes.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The simulation for various methodologies was done and compared. Modulation scheme recognition using the signal envelope method was described by Druckmann et al [3]. This method achieves better recognition rates at short data records and if the data records are longer, then this method fails to recognize to recognize.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%