2012
DOI: 10.1002/jmri.23919
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Automatic model‐based analysis of skeletal muscle BOLD‐MRI in reactive hyperemia

Abstract: The proposed method allows for rapid, operator independent and robust quantification of muscle BOLD signal during reactive hyperemia. The model worked equally well over a wide range of imaging parameters and data quality. This approach should contribute significantly to the standardization of skeletal muscle BOLD-MRI, an important step toward its clinical application.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
12
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
1
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Another strategy to raise significance is to reduce variability by taking model fitted peak and TTP, since the raw peak and TTP is based on a single data point so is highly susceptible to noise. Fitting the responses to a known mathematical function, such as a gamma-variate function, has been demonstrated for reactive hyperemic blood oxygen-level dependent imaging [30]. While the function may also fit ASL reactive hyperemia of the healthy subjects, the diseased responses may not resemble a gamma-variate function, as exemplified by response 9 in Fig 6.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another strategy to raise significance is to reduce variability by taking model fitted peak and TTP, since the raw peak and TTP is based on a single data point so is highly susceptible to noise. Fitting the responses to a known mathematical function, such as a gamma-variate function, has been demonstrated for reactive hyperemic blood oxygen-level dependent imaging [30]. While the function may also fit ASL reactive hyperemia of the healthy subjects, the diseased responses may not resemble a gamma-variate function, as exemplified by response 9 in Fig 6.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To improve SNR, the time courses were smoothed using a moving average window of three time points. To extract the curve parameters peak value (PV), time to peak (TTP), and time from the peak to half peak signal (TT½P) of T 2 *‐weighted signal automatically and to avoid operator‐dependent bias, a model function f(t)=g(t)+s(t)+l(t) g(t)=g0(tt0)g1exp(g2(tt0)) s(t)=s0/(1+exp(s1(tt0t1))) l(t)=l0+l1 (tt0) was fitted to the T 2 *‐weighted time courses of GAS during recovery. PV, TTP and TT½P were calculated numerically from the fit curves.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The S EPI signal as a function of time ( t ) during recovery was then fitted to a model ft=g(t)+s(t)+l0+l1(tt0)gt=g0(tt0)g1normaleg2tt0st=s011+normales1tt0t1described previously . From the fit results, post exercise time to peak (TTP) and peak amplitudes were derived.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%