2000
DOI: 10.1080/01431160050144983
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Automatic mine detection by textural analysis of COTS sidescan sonar imagery

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…So far, quick and automated object identification is only successful when the objects are sitting on homogeneous, low backscatter substrates (e.g., fine sand) [14]. Object identification becomes difficult and even impossible close to the nadir and also when the backscatter is unclear (e.g., stones on mixed sediment).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…So far, quick and automated object identification is only successful when the objects are sitting on homogeneous, low backscatter substrates (e.g., fine sand) [14]. Object identification becomes difficult and even impossible close to the nadir and also when the backscatter is unclear (e.g., stones on mixed sediment).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, automatic detection of objects like stones in sidescan sonar backscatter data is difficult. It basically works out for objects (e.g., mines) lying on homogeneous backscatter grounds [14]. In principle, manual detection is possible but it requires time and high resolution of backscatter to detect small objects.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The fundamental criterion for the detectability of a specific object is that if the object can provide sufficient backscattered acoustic energy to the receiving transducers and if the ambient background backscatter is both uniform and low, then the object can be detected as a sonar target. Theoretically, the backscattering is affected, in decreasing importance, by the geometry of the sensor-target system (relative angle of ensonification), the morphological characteristics of the surface (e.g., micro-scale roughness) and by its intrinsic nature (composition, density, impedance, relative importance of volume and surface reverberation) (BLONDEL; MURTON, 1997;BLONDEL, 2000;LURTON, 2002;TIAN, 2008). Acoustic impedance (the product of density, r and compressional wave velocity, c) can be used to define the reflection coefficient, R for normal incidence, which is a measure of the strength of the reflection (KINSLER, et.…”
Section: Side-scan Sonar Techniquesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Multibeam echo sounders (MBES) and side scan sonars (SSS) have wide applications in remote sensing of seabed topography or morphology [1][2][3][4][5]. The SSS, which usually has higher frequency than MBES, has certain advantages, such as low cost and easy installation, and its ability to obtain large-scale, high-resolution, and high-signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) seabed images [1].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The SSS, which usually has higher frequency than MBES, has certain advantages, such as low cost and easy installation, and its ability to obtain large-scale, high-resolution, and high-signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) seabed images [1]. Given that the towing operation mode is often adopted in SSS measurement, the positions of an SSS towfish are estimated through the headings and positions of the surveying vessel and towing length and depth.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%