2016
DOI: 10.1117/12.2220768
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Automatic lung nodule classification with radiomics approach

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
29
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Hawkins et al proposed a random forest classifier using 23 stable (high reproducibility – concordance correlation coefficients ≥0.95 in test–retest) radiomic features . Ma et al proposed a random forest classifier using 583 radiomic features . Its performance on the same LIDC dataset as used in the present study was comparable to the proposed SVM‐LASSO model.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 61%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Hawkins et al proposed a random forest classifier using 23 stable (high reproducibility – concordance correlation coefficients ≥0.95 in test–retest) radiomic features . Ma et al proposed a random forest classifier using 583 radiomic features . Its performance on the same LIDC dataset as used in the present study was comparable to the proposed SVM‐LASSO model.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 61%
“…30 Ma et al proposed a random forest classifier using 583 radiomic features. 31 Its performance on the same LIDC dataset as used in the present study was comparable to the proposed SVM-LASSO model. However, the number of features used was more than eight times of the number of patients, which may cause a model overfitting problem.…”
Section: C Comparison With Recently Reported Radiomics Modelsmentioning
confidence: 56%
“…The authors assessed 127 indeterminate pulmonary nodules and identified 583 features of nodule intensity, shape and heterogeneity. By analyzing these features they achieved 82.7% accuracy in classification of malignant primary lung nodules and benign nodules (17).…”
Section: Texture Based Analysesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A diagnostic model was then executed with the random forest method. Satisfactorily, the sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of this radiomics classifier toward distinguishing malignant primary lung nodules from benign ones achieved 80.0%, 85.5% and 82.7%, respectively; however, the sensitivity of the traditional experienced radiologists’ annotations was only 56.9% with the same specificity [ 34 ]. Another study has described quantitative analyses of low-dose CT lung cancer screening images from the well-known National Lung Screening Trial (NLST) at baseline to evaluate whether radiomics could predict the subsequent emergence of cancer.…”
Section: Clinical Application Of Radiomics In the Precision Diagnosismentioning
confidence: 99%