Proceedings of the IEEE 2009 National Aerospace &Amp; Electronics Conference (NAECON) 2009
DOI: 10.1109/naecon.2009.5426643
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Automatic loop-shaping of QFT robust controllers

Abstract: This paper introduces a methodology to design automatically QFT (Quantitative Feedback Theory) robust controllers for SISO (single input-single output) plants with model uncertainty. The method generalizes previous automatic loop-shaping techniques, avoiding restrictive assumptions about the search space. This methodology applies two strategies: a) Evolutionary Algorithms, and b) Genetic Algorithms (GA). In both cases the objective is to search the QFT robust controller that fulfils the control specifications … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, this process limits the convergence of the algorithm because such a discretized description cannot be differentiated, while efficient optimization algorithms (local or global) require differentiating at least once the constraints. Second, QFT bounds have been used directly using population‐based optimization algorithms: use a simple constraint that is either 0 or 1 depending on the bound satisfaction, while uses a more elaborated constraint that compute a distance to the bound satisfaction.…”
Section: Quantitative Feedback Theory Formulation Of the Robust Contrmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…However, this process limits the convergence of the algorithm because such a discretized description cannot be differentiated, while efficient optimization algorithms (local or global) require differentiating at least once the constraints. Second, QFT bounds have been used directly using population‐based optimization algorithms: use a simple constraint that is either 0 or 1 depending on the bound satisfaction, while uses a more elaborated constraint that compute a distance to the bound satisfaction.…”
Section: Quantitative Feedback Theory Formulation Of the Robust Contrmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The same issue has been overcome in by computing explicitly the poles and enforcing the greatest real part to be negative. Such an iterative procedure cannot be used directly in standard solvers for nonlinear programming.…”
Section: A Fully Automated One‐step Nonlinear Programming Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The method consists [7], [8], [9] in assuming an initial value of the controller function G( jω), and adjusting the loop function L o ( jω) that verifies the imposed restrictions and minimizes the control effort. The adjustment is made by shifting the loop curve vertically and horizontally on the magnitude-phase plane, until it is situated in such a way as to have the lowest gain possible.…”
Section: Controller Design(loop Specification)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In [6] the controller synthesis problem is posed as interval constraint satisfying problem and solved with interval constraint solver. In [7] a methodology that applies two techniques to design QFT controllers is proposed. The first one is based on evolutionary algorithms and the second is based on genetic algorithms.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%