2021
DOI: 10.1007/s11548-021-02436-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Automatic linear measurements of the fetal brain on MRI with deep neural networks

Abstract: Purpose: Timely, accurate and reliable assessment of fetal brain development is essential to reduce short and longterm risks to fetus and mother. Fetal MRI is increasingly used for fetal brain assessment. Three key biometric linear measurements important for fetal brain evaluation are Cerebral Biparietal Diameter (CBD), Bone Biparietal Diameter (BBD), and Trans-Cerebellum Diameter (TCD), obtained manually by expert radiologists on reference slices, which is time consuming and prone to human error. The aim of t… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Avisdris et al [ 24 ] have developed a fully automated approach for calculating the bone biparietal diameter (BBD), trans-cerebellum diameter (TCD), and cerebral biparietal diameter (CBD) from fetal brain MRI. The suggested automatic technique for calculating fetal brain biometric linear measurements from MR imaging performs at a manual level.…”
Section: Deep Learning (Dl) Overviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Avisdris et al [ 24 ] have developed a fully automated approach for calculating the bone biparietal diameter (BBD), trans-cerebellum diameter (TCD), and cerebral biparietal diameter (CBD) from fetal brain MRI. The suggested automatic technique for calculating fetal brain biometric linear measurements from MR imaging performs at a manual level.…”
Section: Deep Learning (Dl) Overviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, while several automatic approaches for the computation of ultrasound-based biometric linear measurements are provided (Khan et al, 2017 ; van den Heuvel et al, 2018 ; Al-Bander et al, 2019 ), in MRI only a few algorithms are available, e.g. for the evaluation of the cerebral biparietal diameter, the bone biparietal diameter, and the transcerebellar diameter (Avisdris et al, 2021a , b ). These methods mimic the radiologistā€™s manual annotation workflow, but in some cases lack accuracy in the segmentation of the fetal brain or in the selection of the slice to be used for the measurements.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nearly two thirds of the articles ( n = 23, 59%) 6ā€“28 were published in non-clinical journals (computer science, data science and engineering journals), with the remainder published in more clinical and radiologically targeted journals ( n = 16, 41%). 29ā€“44 The vast majority described using AI for imaging the fetal brain ( n = 26, 67%), 11ā€“22,28,30ā€“41,44 and a minority for the fetal body ( n = 5, 13%), 6ā€“9,43 placenta ( n = 6, 15%) 23ā€“27,42 or both ( n = 2, 5%). 10,29 …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The ā€˜use casesā€™ for AI in fetal MRI imaging were broadly classified into several main categories, and a selection of the most clinically relevant papers are expanded upon in more detail in the text below: Image pre-processing: Dynamic motion correction ( n = 8, 21%) 7ā€“9,14,17,19,22,28 Image post-processing: Segmentation of anatomy ( n = 16, 41%), 6,12,13,15,16,20,21,24,26,27,29,32,34,36,37,40 Automated fetal biometry measurement ( n = 1, 3%), 11 Texture analysis ( n = 1, 3%), 33 Classification of image quality ( n = 1, 3%) 39 Data interpretation: Classification of disease ( n = 3, 8%), 18,30,31 Prognostication of outcomes ( n = 4, 10%), 23,41ā€“43 Gestational age prediction ( n = 2, 5%), 38,44 Generation of clinical 3-D models ( n = 1, 3%) 25 Miscellaneous: Generation of synthetic data ( n = 2, 5%) 10,35 …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%