2005
DOI: 10.1007/11528043_27
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Automatic Leveling System for E-Learning Examination Pool Using Entropy-Based Decision Tree

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0
1

Year Published

2008
2008
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
8
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The students can get a higher score when they tested for many times. Another shortcoming is the randomness of difficulty level of test, although many selection algorithms [2] can be used to control it. The difficulty level of test cannot be same for each time.…”
Section: System Innovationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The students can get a higher score when they tested for many times. Another shortcoming is the randomness of difficulty level of test, although many selection algorithms [2] can be used to control it. The difficulty level of test cannot be same for each time.…”
Section: System Innovationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The results database is analysed by data mining and continually monitored in order to track the success rate of the different concepts addressed in the exam. If a particular concept is detected to be too difficult (a local minima during the data mining is identified), then the exam generator is instructed to go further, presenting questions with fine details to other students in order to identify the concept that has not been properly understood (Cheng et al, 2005). The examination tool has been implemented as a web application employing HTML and JavaScript.…”
Section: Examination Tool Examplementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on this analysis, the teachers can offer more relevant suggestions to facilitate improved learning. To date, a variety of CBT systems have been developed, which focus on several topics such as item bank of examination (Cheng, Huang, Chen, & Lin, 2005;He & Tymms, 2005), test sheet generation (Hwang, Yin, & Yeh, 2006;Meng, Ye, Roy, & Padilla, 2007), and so on.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%