2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.ins.2008.11.037
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Automatic knot adjustment using an artificial immune system for B-spline curve approximation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
31
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 74 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
1
31
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Curve approximation has been addressed with genetic algorithms [33,34], artificial immune systems [35,36], estimation of distribution algorithms [37], and hybrid techniques [38]. These works show that nature-inspired metaheuristic methods exhibit a very good performance for the case of curves, suggesting that they might also be very good candidates for the case of surfaces.…”
Section: Previous Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Curve approximation has been addressed with genetic algorithms [33,34], artificial immune systems [35,36], estimation of distribution algorithms [37], and hybrid techniques [38]. These works show that nature-inspired metaheuristic methods exhibit a very good performance for the case of curves, suggesting that they might also be very good candidates for the case of surfaces.…”
Section: Previous Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Roughly, they can be classified into two groups: discrete approaches [58,62,69] and continuous approaches [17,70,72]. Methods in the former group convert the original continuous problem into a discrete combinatorial optimization problem to be solved by either genetic algorithms [58,69] or artificial immune systems [62]. As expected, this conversion process introduces large discretization errors, making them both inaccurate and unreliable for real-world problems.…”
Section: Previous Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although these runtime values make the method not well-suited for real-time applications, it still outperforms the alternative metaheuristic techniques in this regard. For comparison, the methods in [58,62] require from tens of seconds to minutes even for simpler examples than those discussed in this paper (see Table 5 for details). Runtimes improve with the method in [70], but they are still in the range of tens of seconds, clearly slower than ours.…”
Section: Computation Timesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sarfraz and Raza [13]; Yoshimoto et al [18]), artificial immune systems (cf. Gálvez et al [3]; Ülker and Arslan [16]) or estimation of distribution algorithms (cf. Zhao et al [19]).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%