2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2014.07.025
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Automatic initial contact detection during overground walking for clinical use

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
6
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
1
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This newly generated triggering signal showed a very high value of CSI and sensitivity for both children and adults, with an average sensitivity in the adult group of 99.96% and an average CSI of 99.63% and similar values in the children group, 99.39% and 99.26%, respectively. These values are higher than those previously reported in [25] and [26]. Thus, our analysis confirmed an overall goodness of the proposed on-line synchronization system (Phidget trigger), which are enriched by the possibility of recovering off-line the missing information thanks to the integration of the EMG signal trigger.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 82%
“…This newly generated triggering signal showed a very high value of CSI and sensitivity for both children and adults, with an average sensitivity in the adult group of 99.96% and an average CSI of 99.63% and similar values in the children group, 99.39% and 99.26%, respectively. These values are higher than those previously reported in [25] and [26]. Thus, our analysis confirmed an overall goodness of the proposed on-line synchronization system (Phidget trigger), which are enriched by the possibility of recovering off-line the missing information thanks to the integration of the EMG signal trigger.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 82%
“…Considering the idiosyncrasies of the gait patterns of children with SCP, such as FS with the forefoot instead of the heel, these algorithms can fail to accurately detect the essential elements of gait analysis. 8 In many cases, the accuracy of algorithms for automated gait event detection in children with SCP is low and, frequently, a time-consuming visual inspection becomes necessary. 4 Bruening and Ridge 4 compared the accuracy of nine algorithms for the identification of gait events in children with different types of SCP with that of visual classification.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(Vicon, Oxford Metrics Group, Oxford, UK). Gait events, including initial contact and toe-off were detected via an adapted version of the foot velocity algorithm [ 41 ], which used the heel markers of each foot to enable a reliable definition of the gait cycle, even in cases of toe-first contact [ 42 ]. Stride, step, stance and swing phases, as well as double limb support were computed on the basis of those two events [ 43 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%