Proceedings of 1994 3rd International Conference on Software Reuse
DOI: 10.1109/icsr.1994.365814
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Automatic indexing of software artifacts

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0
4

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
5
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…In many cases, like in [4] and [8], they are based on natural language. Other works resort to formal methods to describe the relevant behavior of a component, thus minimizing the problems derived from natural language.…”
Section: Discussion and Future Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In many cases, like in [4] and [8], they are based on natural language. Other works resort to formal methods to describe the relevant behavior of a component, thus minimizing the problems derived from natural language.…”
Section: Discussion and Future Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In another proposal, Girardi [4] presents a system for software reuse based on indexing assets described using natural language. Assets descriptions are expressed in imperative sentences, from which the indexing process generates a structure that follows a representation model adopted by the system.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some of them adopt approaches in which components features are automatically extracted [4]. Despite their advances and benefits, the main problem of such approaches is the fact that components features are obtained directly from information included in source code or documentation (e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The distance they introduce is a weighted linear combination of four functions which reflect whether relevant entities in the query and the asset are identical and to what extent the query and the asset have common attributes via their shared subclasses and their shared super-classes. In [22,23,21] Girardi and Ibrahim introduce a structural measure of distance between software assets, and use it to perform retrieval in a software library. Library assets are represented using case-frame-like representations that are d erived from a declarative definition of the asset in natural language; and queries are derived in a similar fashion from an imperative definition of the desired requirements.…”
Section: Retrieving Assets In Reuse Librariesmentioning
confidence: 99%