2008
DOI: 10.1007/s11042-008-0247-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Automatic image annotation using visual content and folksonomies

Abstract: Abstract. Automatic image annotation is an important and challenging task when managing large image collections. This paper describes techniques for automatic image annotation by taking advantage of collaboratively annotated image databases, so called visual folksonomies. Our approach applies two techniques based on image analysis: Classification annotates images with a controlled vocabulary while tag propagation uses user generated, folksonomic annotations and is therefore capable of dealing with an unlimited… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
24
0
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 56 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
24
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Two systems that can potentially handle unlimited vocabulary are presented in [14] and [15]. Li et al present a content based image retrieval system [14] that propagates textual features from visually similar images.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Two systems that can potentially handle unlimited vocabulary are presented in [14] and [15]. Li et al present a content based image retrieval system [14] that propagates textual features from visually similar images.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Li et al present a content based image retrieval system [14] that propagates textual features from visually similar images. Lindstaedt et al [15] use a combination of off-line supervised classification of images into selected concepts followed by tag propagation from visual similar images. However, these systems need to analyze very large datasets and do not address the localized relevance of tags in a folksonomic setting.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, Linstaedt et al use sophisticated computer programs to analyze still images found within Flickr and then use this analysis to process new images and to propagate relevant user tags to those images. 21 In a slightly more complicated example, Liu and Qin employ machine--learning techniques to initially process and assign metadata, including subject terms, to a repository of documents related to the computer science profession. 22 However, this proof of concept project also permits users to edit the fields of the metadata once established.…”
Section: Social Taggingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, tags allow reusing already existing text-based search techniques. However, as for instance pointed out in [5] and [6], the presence of non-relevant tags hampers the effective organization and retrieval of usercontributed images, motivating the design of techniques that allow differentiating relevant tags from non-relevant tags. In this paper, we consider a tag to be non-relevant when users with common knowledge are not able to easily and consistently relate the tag to the image content, a definition also used by the authors of [7], [8], and [9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%