2017
DOI: 10.1007/s10044-017-0662-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Automatic identification of Scenedesmus polymorphic microalgae from microscopic images

Abstract: Microalgae counting is used to measure biomass quantity. Usually, it is performed in a manual way using a Neubauer chamber and expert criterion, with the risk of a high error rate. This paper addresses the methodology for automatic identification of Scenedesmus microalgae (used in the methane production and food industry) and applies it to images captured by a digital microscope.

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
(26 reference statements)
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The effectiveness of each algorithm was verified by testing in a real-world environment. Jhony−Heriberto Giraldo −Zuluaga et al utilized a digital microscope to take images of the microalgae and obtained the microalgae species through the image process (Giraldo-Zuluaga et al, 2016). Images were characterized by statistical features, which were derived from the calculation and analysis of texture features.…”
Section: Microalgae Detection and Classification With Machine Learningmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The effectiveness of each algorithm was verified by testing in a real-world environment. Jhony−Heriberto Giraldo −Zuluaga et al utilized a digital microscope to take images of the microalgae and obtained the microalgae species through the image process (Giraldo-Zuluaga et al, 2016). Images were characterized by statistical features, which were derived from the calculation and analysis of texture features.…”
Section: Microalgae Detection and Classification With Machine Learningmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Experimental results predicted better classification accuracy for CNN. Giraldo_Zuluaga et al [ 79 ] proposed an automatic identification approach for Scenedesmus algae in microscopic images. The dataset consisted of Scenedesmus coenobia images belonging to four classes; coenobia with one cell, coenobia with 2 cells, coenobia with 4 cells and coenobia with 8 cells.…”
Section: In Microorganisms Image Recognitionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…= 93.60% Imbalanced dataset Qiu et al [ 76 ] Image segmentation of Chaetoceros SVM, threshold method, grey Surface direction angle model Pixel-level features C = 2 Chaetoceros contour was not completely filled in segmentation results Correa et al [ 77 ] Classification of microalgae species using imbalanced dataset Feature extraction using FlowCam SVM, K-NN, ANN, naïve bayes C = 19 TI = 24,302 Kappa = 0.981 F1-score = 0.982 Limited features were extracted using Flowcam Medina et al [ 78 ] Detection of algae in underwater pipeline Shape, Texture and deep features CNN and MLP (ANN) C = 2 TI = 41,992 Acc. = 99.4% Incomplete details about quantity of dataset classes Giraldo-Zuluaga et al [ 79 ] Identification of Scenedesmus Microalgae in microscopic images Threshold method Shape and Texture features SVM, ANN C = 4 TI = 1680 Acc. = 98.63% High processing time Dannemiller et al [ 80 ] Segmentation of algae microscopic images Non-uniform background Subtraction, SVM Texture features C = 2 Tr.…”
Section: In Microorganisms Image Recognitionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Early work on the applications of machine learning in algae classification can date back from 1992 [4], in which, a feedforward neural network was trained using OPA (Optical Plankton Analyser) features of 8 algae, achieving an average classification accuracy of over 90%, without graphic features. Giraldo-Zuluaga et al [8] proposed to use the segmentation algorithm to filter, orient, and subsequently extract the micro-algae profiles from microscopic images for micro-algae identification, which reported an accuracy of 98.6% with Support Vector Machine (SVM) and 97.3% with Artificial Neural Network (ANN) with 2 hidden layers, respectively. Li et al features or extracted features from image processing, which lack generality in different environments.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%