2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.isci.2020.101412
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Automatic Identification of Individual Primates with Deep Learning Techniques

Abstract: Summary The difficulty of obtaining reliable individual identification of animals has limited researcher's ability to obtain quantitative data to address important ecological, behavioral, and conservation questions. Traditional marking methods placed animals at undue risk. Machine learning approaches for identifying species through analysis of animal images has been proved to be successful. But for many questions, there needs a tool to identify not only species but also individuals. Here, we introdu… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
38
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 55 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
(27 reference statements)
0
38
0
Order By: Relevance
“…6 To locate individuals, researchers can rely on animal‐borne tracking technology, such as GPS tracking devices (Kays et al, 2015; Rasolofoniaina et al, 2021), or knowledge of the position of key foraging patches (Aplin et al, 2015) or territories (Shaw et al, 2015; McCune et al, 2019). In addition, recent advances in deep learning technology make it possible to automatically identify specific individuals from images and videos (Ferreira et al, 2020; Guo et al, 2020; Hou et al, 2020). For species with limited home ranges, outdoor enclosures could be built on‐site allowing not only easier identification and localization but also manipulation of habitat structure and thus thermal environment (Sears et al, 2016; Li et al, 2017).…”
Section: A Framework For Future Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…6 To locate individuals, researchers can rely on animal‐borne tracking technology, such as GPS tracking devices (Kays et al, 2015; Rasolofoniaina et al, 2021), or knowledge of the position of key foraging patches (Aplin et al, 2015) or territories (Shaw et al, 2015; McCune et al, 2019). In addition, recent advances in deep learning technology make it possible to automatically identify specific individuals from images and videos (Ferreira et al, 2020; Guo et al, 2020; Hou et al, 2020). For species with limited home ranges, outdoor enclosures could be built on‐site allowing not only easier identification and localization but also manipulation of habitat structure and thus thermal environment (Sears et al, 2016; Li et al, 2017).…”
Section: A Framework For Future Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The method of tracking specific points on faces can also be used to identify individuals and emotional states when it comes to animal subjects. With a little software reconstruction, scientists have been able to create reliable systems for the assessment of animal emotions through technological means [23,24]. These systems have been specified to identify multiple species including, cows, cats, sheep, large carnivores, and many species of non-human primate.…”
Section: Facial Recognition Softwarementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In studies focusing on identifying individual members of the same species within a group, the accuracy of specialized facial recognition software was found to be between 94% and 98.7%. Some of these studies even displayed the ability of software to identify and categorize new individuals within a group and the ability to identify individuals at night [23][24][25]. Other studies focused more on the emotional expressions that could be identified through facial recognition software and some of the studies showed an accuracy of around 80% when compared to the findings of professionals in the field of animal emotion identification [26].…”
Section: Facial Recognition Softwarementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Gue [11] suggested automated face detection and individual identification for both videos and still-framed images using deep learning methods. The proposed system was trained and tested with a dataset containing 102,399 images.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%