2013 7th IEEE GCC Conference and Exhibition (GCC) 2013
DOI: 10.1109/ieeegcc.2013.6705761
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Automatic handedness detection from off-line handwriting

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In all cases, the run-length features outperform these features. Finally, for the comparison of the proposed method with other methods, the average correct handedness detection results are over 83.43 %, which exceeds the results reported in [30] for off-line gender identification (70 %) on the same dataset. The results also compare well with the 73 %; 55.39 % reported for gender classification in [36,43] on different datasets.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 61%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In all cases, the run-length features outperform these features. Finally, for the comparison of the proposed method with other methods, the average correct handedness detection results are over 83.43 %, which exceeds the results reported in [30] for off-line gender identification (70 %) on the same dataset. The results also compare well with the 73 %; 55.39 % reported for gender classification in [36,43] on different datasets.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 61%
“…Other applications including such as off-line handwriting recognition systems for different languages reached up to 99 % for handwritten characters [29]. For handedness detection our earlier study proved that it can work [30]. Authors in [25] evaluated the performance of edgebased directional probability distributions as features in comparison to a number of non-angular features.…”
Section: A Review Of Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Regarding the complexity of the proposed model with respect to classical approaches (i.e., feature-based ones), from a developer's viewpoint using convolutional neural networks (CNN) is simpler than determining which features are the best ones for discriminating each class. Differently from other analyzed feature-based proposals (see, e.g., [11,35,40]), when using CNN one does not have to discover which features are relevant to solve the problem (i.e., this approach is a drop-in replacement to hand-made feature descriptors). Since these good internal representations are now found by the network, the model is much simpler and powerful at the same time.…”
Section: Analysis and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In 2007 Liwicki et al [10] also proposed an online method for handedness detection using SVM and GMM for classification using the IAM database and reported results of 62% with SVM and 84.6% with GMM, respectively. Al-Maadeed and others [40] studied in 2013 the offline handedness classification problem (i.e., without using dynamic information from handwriting). They extracted shape and curvature features from strokes and used a knn classifier, reporting results of 71.5% on the QUWI database (with both English and Arabic texts).…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Experiments conducted on IAM dataset reported an accuracy about 67.7%. Furthermore, in [5], [6], [7] authors employed a private dataset of Arabic handwritten sentences to predict writers gender, age range and nationality. Prediction schemes including, SVM, neural networks, random forest and linear discriminate analysis provided scores around 70%.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%