2020
DOI: 10.31127/tuje.641501
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Automatic Ground Extraction for Urban Areas From Airborne Lidar Data

Abstract: Terrain models play a key role in many applications, such as hydrological modeling, volume calculation, wire and pipeline route planning as well as many engineering applications. While terrain models can be generated from traditional data sources, an advanced and recently popular geospatial technology, Light Detection and Ranging (LiDAR) data, is also a source for generating high-density terrain models in the last decades. The main advantage of LiDAR technology over traditional data sources is that it generate… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Ground truth data were subsequently obtained from aerial photographs of a complex urban area to classify buildings, trees, asphalt roads and the ground with respective accuracies of 77.90%, 58.37%, 72.90% and 71.53%. A ground point extraction automated algorithm based on the height difference of ground points and non-ground points for each point on three LiDAR data sets was proposed and evaluated quantitatively and qualitatively by Sevgen et al [ 57 ]. The overall accuracies were calculated to be 95%, 97%, and 98% for the three LiDAR data sets.…”
Section: Data Processingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ground truth data were subsequently obtained from aerial photographs of a complex urban area to classify buildings, trees, asphalt roads and the ground with respective accuracies of 77.90%, 58.37%, 72.90% and 71.53%. A ground point extraction automated algorithm based on the height difference of ground points and non-ground points for each point on three LiDAR data sets was proposed and evaluated quantitatively and qualitatively by Sevgen et al [ 57 ]. The overall accuracies were calculated to be 95%, 97%, and 98% for the three LiDAR data sets.…”
Section: Data Processingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Active and passive remote sensors have been successfully used for vegetation monitoring, for purposes such as species classification, health status, and tree allometry assessment. Light detection and ranging (LiDAR) techniques have been demonstrated to be an efficient and accurate method for distinguishing between trees and vegetation in urban environments [ 6 , 7 ]. Spectral imaging and LiDAR data have been combined to identity woody crop species [ 8 ] in different kinds of orchards, including sweet chestnut.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%