2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.measurement.2012.06.012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Automatic grain size determination in microstructures using image processing

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
29
0
3

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 69 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
29
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…The ubiquitous connection between microstructure (mainly, grain-size distribution) of a material and its physical properties has motivated numerous studies on developing robust techniques to analyze microscopy/tomography images. [13][14][15][16][17][18] ASTM outlines the industry standard for grain identification in 2D data, 16 which consists of methods such as matching, planimetric, and intercept methods. These methods, albeit can achieve high accuracy (±0.25 grain size units) and reproducibility, can be severely impaired when the intersection criterion (for distinguishing grains) is poorly chosen or the grain-size distribution is non-uniform.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The ubiquitous connection between microstructure (mainly, grain-size distribution) of a material and its physical properties has motivated numerous studies on developing robust techniques to analyze microscopy/tomography images. [13][14][15][16][17][18] ASTM outlines the industry standard for grain identification in 2D data, 16 which consists of methods such as matching, planimetric, and intercept methods. These methods, albeit can achieve high accuracy (±0.25 grain size units) and reproducibility, can be severely impaired when the intersection criterion (for distinguishing grains) is poorly chosen or the grain-size distribution is non-uniform.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These methods, albeit can achieve high accuracy (±0.25 grain size units) and reproducibility, can be severely impaired when the intersection criterion (for distinguishing grains) is poorly chosen or the grain-size distribution is non-uniform. 16 In addition, these technique often require tedious manual measurements, and automation is challenging due variability in etching level or contrast differences although electron back scattering diffraction methods have been recently proposed to eliminate subjectivity surrounding existence/location of grain boundaries. 15,19 Automated methods for grain identification in 2D data have been developed over the years.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Os métodos semiautomáticos consistem, basicamente, em aplicar as regras dos procedimentos manuais, previstos na norma ASTM E112, utilizando o auxílio de um computador ou uma mesa digitalizadora [7]. A análise de imagem aplicada a metalografia tem se tornado uma ferramenta importante quando se é exigido à avaliação de um grande número de microestruturas em um curto período de tempo, bem como em processos onde são necessários o máximo de repetibilidade e reprodutibilidade das medidas [8,9]. Além dos métodos semiautomáticos, a norma ASTM E1382 estabelece algumas metodologias para determinar o tamanho médio de grão de modo automático.…”
Section: Introductionunclassified
“…Peregrina-Barreto et al [14] report that they had problems with the accurate determination of the microstructures from metallographic images which they were processing. Images were differently illuminated, this causing a lot of noise on the image, low contrasts, badly defined boundaries and so on.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%