2010 Fifth International Conference on Software Engineering Advances 2010
DOI: 10.1109/icsea.2010.78
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Automatic Generation of Test Suites from Decision Table - Theory and Implementation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0
2

Year Published

2012
2012
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
11
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…It is important to point out that this paper does not focus on individual testing techniques that can be used within the testing process. For example, common testing techniques in ST for black‐box testing include, boundary value analysis , equivalence partitioning , and decision tables . For ST, the commonly used white‐box testing techniques include decision coverage , path coverage , multiple condition/decision coverage (MC/DC) , and data flow coverage .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is important to point out that this paper does not focus on individual testing techniques that can be used within the testing process. For example, common testing techniques in ST for black‐box testing include, boundary value analysis , equivalence partitioning , and decision tables . For ST, the commonly used white‐box testing techniques include decision coverage , path coverage , multiple condition/decision coverage (MC/DC) , and data flow coverage .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sharma and Chandra (2010) propose to shape business rules into decision tables, and to use those for the generation of test suites. Same as our methodology, this is a black-box approach that does not require code inspection and has a potential to be automated, but lacks tool support and industry-level validation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…as well as to model their possible combinations (Sharma and Chandra B., 2010;Feng et al, 2011). Decision Tables (DTs) have been associated to cause-effect graphs (Section 2.3.1), though they can be directly applied for testing (Binder, 1999;Myers et al, 2004;Mathur, 2008).…”
Section: Modeling Techniquesmentioning
confidence: 99%