Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Computer Supported Education 2017
DOI: 10.5220/0006320203790386
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Automatic Generation of English Reference Question by Utilising Nonrestrictive Relative Clause

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There has been a considerable number of studies on automatic question generation, particularly for the English test purposes (Brown et al 2005;Lin et al 2007;Smith et al 2010;Sakaguchi et al 2013;Susanti et al 2015;Satria and Tokunaga 2017). Multiple-choice question, in particular, has received extra attention because it appears in standardised English proficiency tests such as TOEFL, TOEIC and IELTS.…”
Section: Automatic Question Generation (Aqg)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There has been a considerable number of studies on automatic question generation, particularly for the English test purposes (Brown et al 2005;Lin et al 2007;Smith et al 2010;Sakaguchi et al 2013;Susanti et al 2015;Satria and Tokunaga 2017). Multiple-choice question, in particular, has received extra attention because it appears in standardised English proficiency tests such as TOEFL, TOEIC and IELTS.…”
Section: Automatic Question Generation (Aqg)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, Hoshino and Nakagawa (2005) developed a real-time system that generates multiple-choice questions on English grammar and vocabulary from online news articles. More recently, Susanti et al (2015) generated the multiple-choice English vocabulary questions currently used in TOEFL, while Satria and Tokunaga (2017) worked on the TOEFL English pronoun reference questions. Araki et al (2016) introduced a method to generate multiple-choice open-ended questions for reading comprehension.…”
Section: Automatic Question Generation Systemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since readily available systems for generating MCQs lack informative sentences, the quality of generated distractors is low. The proposed system overcomes such gaps in the prevalent works ( Malinova & Rahneva, 2016 ; Susanti et al, 2016 ; Satria & Tokunaga, 2017 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%