1992
DOI: 10.1007/bfb0035125
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Automatic generation of documentation for information systems

Abstract: Documentation plays a central role in Information Systems (IS) development and use. Soltware tools must be built to allow its automatic generation. In the same way as the need of prototyping for IS construction is generally accepted, so must be the need for "Documentation Prototyping". In this paper a paradigm for the generation of documentation is proposed. It can be adapted to any IS development approach. In order to illustrate the proposed ideas, the Infolog approach was chosen in this paper.On-line documen… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
0
0

Year Published

1995
1995
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
2
2
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There also exist approaches to generate abstracts of model specifications (such as documentation in natural language, user manuals, etc.) (Jesus et al 1992).…”
Section: Paraphrasingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…There also exist approaches to generate abstracts of model specifications (such as documentation in natural language, user manuals, etc.) (Jesus et al 1992).…”
Section: Paraphrasingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As we have seen in the state of the art on conceptual schema validation presented in Section 2.2, several existing techniques are used to achieve correct and complete conceptual schemas in different degrees. These include paraphrasing in natural language (Rolland et al 1992, Dalianis 1992, Métais 2002, Frederiks et al 2006, generation of abstractions and abstracts (Jesus et al 1992), explanation generation (Gulla et al 1993, Olivé et al 1996, Gulla 1996, constraint acquisition (Hartmann et al 2009) or simulation and animation (Van Lamsweerde 2009, Lindland et al 1994, Dignum et al 1987, Gogolla et al 1995, Gogolla et al 2007.…”
Section: Validation Of Conceptual Schemas: An Open Challengementioning
confidence: 99%