2017
DOI: 10.15837/ijccc.2017.4.2751
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Automatic Generation Control by Hybrid Invasive Weed Optimization and Pattern Search Tuned 2-DOF PID Controller

Abstract: A hybrid invasive weed optimization and pattern search (hIWO-PS) technique is proposed in this paper to design 2 degree of freedom proportionalintegral- derivative (2-DOF-PID) controllers for automatic generation control (AGC) of interconnected power systems. Firstly, the proposed approach is tested in an interconnected two-area thermal power system and the advantage of the proposed approach has been established by comparing the results with recently published methods like conventional Ziegler Nichols (ZN), di… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…10. 1 Nominal system parameters (a) 2-ANTPS [16,[22][23][24][25]27]: P r = 2000 MW, P n = 50%, R i = 2.4 Hz/puMW, F 0 = 60 Hz, β i = 0.425 puMW/Hz, T Gi = 0.08 s, K PSi = 120 Hz/puMW, T PSi = 20 s, T Ti = 0.3 s, 2πT 12 = 0.545 puMW/Hz, ΔP D1 = 0.01 puMW, α 12 = −1, ΔF UL = 10 mHz, ΔF LL − 10 mHz, R AG = 2.4 Hz/puMW, [17-1λ, 26, 34]…”
Section: Appendixmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…10. 1 Nominal system parameters (a) 2-ANTPS [16,[22][23][24][25]27]: P r = 2000 MW, P n = 50%, R i = 2.4 Hz/puMW, F 0 = 60 Hz, β i = 0.425 puMW/Hz, T Gi = 0.08 s, K PSi = 120 Hz/puMW, T PSi = 20 s, T Ti = 0.3 s, 2πT 12 = 0.545 puMW/Hz, ΔP D1 = 0.01 puMW, α 12 = −1, ΔF UL = 10 mHz, ΔF LL − 10 mHz, R AG = 2.4 Hz/puMW, [17-1λ, 26, 34]…”
Section: Appendixmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Via suitable control arrangements, LFC reinstate the system stability and preserve the frequency/power at anticipated values. Various optimal, robust and intelligent control methodologies as stated few above are utilised as potential solutions to get a robust performance and stability of real PSs [12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26]. These include hybrid human brain emotional learning PI [12], sine-cosine algorithm based on wavelet mutation (SCAWM) based model-free non-linear sliding mode controller (MFNSMC) [13], hybrid SCA-HS algorithm based FO-SMC [14], firefly algorithm-pattern search (hFA-PS) tuned PI/PID [15], hybrid invasive weed optimisation-PS (hIWO-PS) tuned PI/2-DOF-PID [16], multi-objective genetic algorithm (MOGA)/GA tuned PI/PID [17,18], modified evolutionary particle swarm optimisation-time varying acceleration coefficient (MEPSO-TVAC) tuned PID [19], dragonfly algorithm (DA) tuned PID/2DOF-PID [20], blended biogeography based optimisation (BBBO) tuned PID [21], grey wolf optimisation (GWO)/ensemble of mutation and crossover strategies and parameters in differential evolution (EPSDE) tuned PI/PID [22], hybrid gravitational search algorithm-PS (hGSA-PS) tuned PI/PID with filter (PIDF) [23], salp swarm algorithm (SSA) tuned PIDF/ tilt IDF (TIDF)/cascade control-TIDF (CC-TIDF) [24], differential evolution (DE) tuned PID/TIDF [25] and lozi map-based chaotic optimisation algorithm (LCOA) tuned PID [26] controllers applied on different PS configurations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…To boost AGC outcome, different control and tuning approaches are available in the recent literature. Some of them implemented in various traditional and restructured systems are classical [1], minoritycharge carrier inspired algorithm optimized I/PI/ID [1], biogeography based optimisation based 3-degree-of-freedom-PID (3DOF-PID) [2], genetic algorithm (GA) based integral minus proportional derivative (IPD)/PI/PID [3,4], imperialist competitive algorithm (ICA) based fuzzy-tilt-I-D with filter-double integral (FTIDN-II) [5], sine-cosine algorithm (SCA) tuned cascade fractional order (FO) PI-FOPIDN [6], SCA tuned cascade FOPI-FOPDN [7], wolf pack hunting strategy based control [8], multi-agent double deep Q network-action discovery (AD) based control [9], deep policy dynamics based win or learn fast-policy hill climbing (PDWoLF-PHC ) network based control [10], PDWoLF-PHC(λ) strategy [11,12], deep-reinforcement-learning-based three-network double-delay actor-critic control strategy [13], SCA optimized proportional derivative-proportional integral derivative with double derivative filter (PDPID + DDF) [14], grey wolf optimization (GWO) optimized PI/PID [15], artificial bee colony algorithm (ABCA) optimized PI/PID [16], hybrid firefly algorithmpattern search (hFA-PS) technique optimized PI/PID [17], ICA optimized PID [18], jaya algorithm-invasive weed optimization (JA-IWO) optimized PID [19], bacterial swarm optimization (BSO) optimized PID/FOPID [20], optics inspired optimization (OIO) optimized PID [21], symbiotic organisms search (SOS) algorithm optimized PID/PIDN [22,23], quasioppositional differential search algorithm (QODSA) optimized PI/PID [24], hybrid IWO-PS (hIWO-PS) tuned 2DOF-PID [25] and whale optimization algorithm (WOA) optimized cascade PIDN-FOPD [26]. Since, the operating conditions of power system are liable to vary widely over the time due to wearing out of the components, the conventional controllers optimized for fixed operating condition might work inappropriately in changed operating condition.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%