Automatic framework for requirement analysis phase

Elsaid, Asmaa; Salem, Rashed; Abdul-Kader, Hatem

doi:10.1109/icces.2015.7393045

Cited by 7 publications

(7 citation statements)

References 4 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Therefore, preparing a session for all selected stakeholders to collect and classify requirements is not trivial task. One of the efficient and formal requirement elicitation techniques that can deal with different schedules and different locations is the online questionnaire [14]. The online questionnaire is used as a formal tool that helped in describing, specifying, and prioritising (based on stakeholders preference) requirements well.…”

Section: Overview Of the Proposed Frameworkmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…After studying and analysing the complaints gathered previously about the faculty website, a number of existing requirements want to be enhanced/upgraded and a number of new requirements want to be added. An online questionnaire is set up only to help the requirement elicitation and release planning modelling phase based on the steps in [14]. The questionnaire comprises of three parts: the first part is for gathering each stakeholder personal information including name, faculty job position, last certificate, and so on.…”

Section: Phase 1: Requirement Elicitation and Release Planning Modellingmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…low importance must choose a grade from 0 to 40). For classifying according to the urgency attribute of a requirement, stak [14], if the stakeholder wishes not to see the requirement in the coming (first) version and the next (second) version, the proposed automatic framework decides to put urgency of this requirement to postponed or delayed. The urgency of the requirement decided by the stakeholder should take a grade from 0 to 9 according to the version that the stakeholder wishes to see the requirement implemented in.…”

Section: Phase 1: Requirement Elicitation and Release Planning Modellingmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…This flexibility is expected to increase the stakeholders’ concentration and eliminate rushing while filling the questionnaire. Also, online questionnaire provides new unique capabilities like incorporating multimedia graphics as well as audio into the survey instrument [14]. In addition to the online questionnaire, documents analysis elicitation technique can also be reviewed to support the elicitation process.…”

Section: Overview Of the Proposed Frameworkmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 3 more Smart Citations

Proposed framework for planning software releases using fuzzy rule‐based system

2019

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Software release planning is one of the complicated areas of software engineering. Planning a software release includes assigning requirements to sequence of releases in the most beneficial way within the limited effort, budget, and time available. The complexity of the software release planning is due to the incompleteness and the uncertainty challenges that characterise the software release planning problem. In order to handle efficiently the incompleteness and uncertainty challenges, the computer intelligent fuzzy logic approach can be utilised. Although several methods have been proposed to handle the incompleteness and uncertainty challenges, they are all based on optimisation methods. The objective of this study is to propose a novel framework to handle the uncertainty and incomplete challenges of the software release planning based on intelligent approaches such as fuzzy rule-based system rather than optimisation method. Also, some predefined thresholds are determined to support the time flexible horizon challenge of the software release planning process and to increase the flexibility of the proposed framework. For validating the proposed framework, it is applied to plan a new release for updating a faculty website project.

show abstract

Section: Overview Of the Proposed Frameworkmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Phase 1: Requirement Elicitation and Release Planning Modellingmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Phase 1: Requirement Elicitation and Release Planning Modellingmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Overview Of the Proposed Frameworkmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Proposed framework for planning software releases using fuzzy rule‐based system

2019

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Basically, these processes are bound to vary at different levels depending on the kind of people that will be involved, organisational requirements and the application domain that is being employed. RE-E is a process that is used to determine and discover the needs of the clients or customers to find application domain [4], RA declares exactly what the software project is aimed to achieve [5], RS is used to document and presents a blueprint to the stakeholders for the process of software development [6], RVV acts as a proof that the software product may meet the needs of the stakeholders or customers [2] and finally RM is responsible for ensuring the existing requirements' modification are done in a controlled manner [7]. Figure 1 shows the activities involved in RE.…”

Section: Requirement Engineeringmentioning

confidence: 99%

Onto-Engineering: A Conceptual framework for Integrating Requirement Engineering Process with scientifically tuned Digital Forensics Ontologies

Kebande¹,

Maake²

2017

IJCSDF

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

A framework for integrating Requirement Engineering (RE) with scientifically tuned Digital Forensics Ontologies (SDFO) envisages a semantic web-driven approach that is able to provide a shared understanding of unifying RE techniques coupled with digital investigation techniques that are tuned from an ontological perspective. In the context of this paper, RE has been portrayed as a discipline that can not only be able to validate, specify, analyse and provide elicitation of the requirements but also to manage them effectively. Nevertheless, SDFO have been employed as bodies of knowledge that provides a shared understanding of knowledge or discipline within the Digital Forensic (DF) domain that helps to solve some given problems. Mainly, this requires the mapping/integrating of RE processes to DF tuned ontologies. The objective of the work presented in this paper, therefore, is to show how RE can be integrated into SDFO with the aim of identifying the most effective scientific approaches using an OntoTuning Matcher (OTM) that has been proposed in this paper. This paper was able to represent a scientifically tuned approach using the Automatic Semantic Mapping of Ontologies (ASMOV) approach. ASMOV provides an approach that is able to align ontologies with other systems such that inconsistencies are eliminated and the accuracy is increased. The contribution of the paper is presented in two folds: Firstly, the author identifies a high-level Onto-Engineered framework for integrating RE and SDFO, thereafter, a more detailed Onto-Engineered framework is discussed. The Onto-Engineered framework that has been discussed in this paper will help to clarify different diversification aspects that exists between RE and SDFO.

show abstract

A Comparative Systematic Analysis of Stakeholder’s Identification Methods in Requirements Elicitation

Khan

Assam

et al. 2022

IEEE Access

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Context and Motivation]Before eliciting and gathering requirements for a software project, it is considered pivotal to know about concerned stakeholders. It becomes hard to elicit the actual system requirements without identifying relevant stakeholders, leading the software project to failure. Despite the paramount importance of stakeholder identification in requirement elicitation, it has been given less attention in the software engineering literature.[Method] For this purpose, we conducted a thorough Systematic Literature Review (SLR) on stakeholder identification (SI) and its methods in requirement elicitation. However, previously, a literature study on SI in the requirement elicitation was conducted. We found that no one has proposed any standard or baseline research method for stakeholder identification, stakeholder assessment, and stakeholder interaction up to date according to our knowledge. It provides an opportunity to update the current SLR on SI in requirements elicitation from 2011 till 2021 to search for a baseline methodology for the SI. For this purpose, we explored the existing literature research that involves the SI methods in requirements elicitation. [Principle Ideas/Results] Furthermore, we identify and capture seventeen research methodologies for SI, eight key stakeholders interaction methods, and ten stakeholders assessment methods in requirement elicitation. To further enhance the stakeholder identification process, we additionally identify pivotal information such as different potential stakeholder categories, stakeholder assessments methods, and stakeholder interaction methods. Also, based on the proposed SLR, we find out the existing gaps and new opportunities for SI methods in the requirement elicitation. [Contribution] These SI methodologies help requirements engineers and practitioners identify key stakeholders and efficiently improve the requirements quality. Moreover, this research study helps identify the effective practices used for the traditional and CrowdRE SI, recover consequences that can affect the effectiveness of SI, and recommend advisable SI practices to be employed in the future. This research study would help the software researchers and developers efficiently and accurately identify correct and concerned stakeholders to improve end-user satisfaction instead of considering it a self-evident task. INDEX TERMS Stakeholder Identification, stakeholder methods, Requirement Elicitation, SLR.

show abstract

Automatic framework for requirement analysis phase

Cited by 7 publications

References 4 publications

Proposed framework for planning software releases using fuzzy rule‐based system

Proposed framework for planning software releases using fuzzy rule‐based system

Onto-Engineering: A Conceptual framework for Integrating Requirement Engineering Process with scientifically tuned Digital Forensics Ontologies

A Comparative Systematic Analysis of Stakeholder’s Identification Methods in Requirements Elicitation

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About