2017
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-65831-5_10
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Automatic Extraction of Design Decisions from Issue Management Systems: A Machine Learning Based Approach

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
29
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
3
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The studies of Sharma et al [22], Bhat et al [3], Brennan et al [7], Nassif et al [17] and Viviani et al [31] are similar to what is proposed to answer our RQ2. They identified knowledge in textual data from developer communication, through a classification technique.…”
Section: Related Worksupporting
confidence: 82%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The studies of Sharma et al [22], Bhat et al [3], Brennan et al [7], Nassif et al [17] and Viviani et al [31] are similar to what is proposed to answer our RQ2. They identified knowledge in textual data from developer communication, through a classification technique.…”
Section: Related Worksupporting
confidence: 82%
“…We used Gitter's search based on tags, names and description of chat rooms to identify chat rooms. The list of search terms is available online 3 . We selected all chat rooms except for non-English chat rooms, chat rooms without messages messages from bots, or chat rooms with fewer than four users.…”
Section: Exploring Knowledge In Developer Communicationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With regard to DD, the work of Bhat et al [77] identifies DD from the issue management systems that manage the software architectures. This work has improved by Bhat et al [78] supporting the DD-making process in terms of quality criteria and clustering the DD using the k-means algorithm.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…criteria, decisions, issues, alternatives and justification. Also, Bhat et al [34] expedite the issue tracking system to automatically identify and classify architectural design decisions using machine learning algorithms. Kanchev et al [35] extracted a large number of user comments from the user forum, then using high-level query language to identify requirement-related information for a system analyst to future decision making.…”
Section: Mining Rationale In Software and Requirements Engineeringmentioning
confidence: 99%