2022
DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.2205.08029
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Automatic Error Classification and Root Cause Determination while Replaying Recorded Workload Data at SAP HANA

Abstract: Capturing customer workloads of database systems to replay these workloads during internal testing can be beneficial for software quality assurance. However, we experienced that such replays can produce a large amount of false positive alerts that make the results unreliable or time consuming to analyze. Therefore, we design a machine learning based approach that attributes root causes to the alerts. This provides several benefits for quality assurance and allows for example to classify whether an alert is tru… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

1
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, we apply, among others, machine learning (ML) techniques (support vector machines, decision trees) to automate the risk assessment based on available data about bugs [51]. Similarly, we use ML-based approaches to classify issues for root cause analysis while replaying recorded workload data [47].…”
Section: Risk-based Quality Assurancementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Therefore, we apply, among others, machine learning (ML) techniques (support vector machines, decision trees) to automate the risk assessment based on available data about bugs [51]. Similarly, we use ML-based approaches to classify issues for root cause analysis while replaying recorded workload data [47].…”
Section: Risk-based Quality Assurancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several challenges require to map a large amount of data to correct actions, i.e., typical classification tasks. Hence, we utilize machine learning to, e.g., analyze false positives in test results and identify root causes of failures [47].…”
Section: Customer Scenario Testingmentioning
confidence: 99%