Notes on Numerical Fluid Mechanics and Multidisciplinary Design (NNFM)
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-540-74460-3_56
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Automatic Differentiation of an Entire Design Chain for Aerodynamic Shape Optimization

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
23
0

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This extremely powerful approach is extensively used in sensitivity analysis of complex models, such as those used in meteorology (Marotzke and Giering, 1999) or in the field of aerodynamics (Gauger et al, 2008). Sambridge et al (2007) was the very first application of AD in geophysics.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This extremely powerful approach is extensively used in sensitivity analysis of complex models, such as those used in meteorology (Marotzke and Giering, 1999) or in the field of aerodynamics (Gauger et al, 2008). Sambridge et al (2007) was the very first application of AD in geophysics.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The gradient is then used for optimizing the wing shape, which involves iterated simulation and gradient evaluation. See [5,7,12] for more details and background information.…”
Section: Application Examplementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because it is often not immediately clear how to compute these "mesh sensitivities", that is the variation of the PDE with respect to a change in the geometry, there is often a strong desire for a very smooth parametrization of the domain with as few design parameters as possible. Although there have been successful attempts to incorporate problem structure exploitations in order to efficiently compute these partial derivatives for very large problems, such as differentiating the entire design chain at once or by considering the adjoint process of the mesh deformation [5,17], very often one is still forced into finite differencing, which means the PDE residual at steady state has to be evaluated on meshes that have been perturbed by a variation in each design parameter of the shape, a process that makes large scale optimization usually prohibitive. This negates some of the advantages of the adjoint approach, such as the independence of the number of design parameters.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%