2020
DOI: 10.3233/xst-200644
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Automatic detection of the meningioma tumor firmness in MRI images

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In medicine, GLCM was initially investigated as a method for evaluation of radiological images such as those obtained using ultrasound, computerized tomography, and nuclear magnetic resonance (Chen et al, 2015; AlKubeyyer et al, 2020). Only later, after the year 2010, the method became popular in microscopy research, as a potential tool for detecting and identifying pathological cell and tissues.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In medicine, GLCM was initially investigated as a method for evaluation of radiological images such as those obtained using ultrasound, computerized tomography, and nuclear magnetic resonance (Chen et al, 2015; AlKubeyyer et al, 2020). Only later, after the year 2010, the method became popular in microscopy research, as a potential tool for detecting and identifying pathological cell and tissues.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This method was also successfully applied for the quantification of changes in nuclear chromatin organization and distribution during the processes of physiological aging, programmed cell death, as well as carcinogenesis (Pantic et al, 2017; Kanai et al, 2020; Lee et al, 2020). Today, various supplementary techniques to GLCM are also occasionally used in medicine, the most important probably being the discrete wavelet transform as a form of textural analysis (Vidya et al, 2015; AlKubeyyer et al, 2020).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some other features of meningiomas, which could be relevant for surgical planning, might be determined using radiomic analysis. For example, the consistency of meningioma (hard or soft) could be predicted using machine-based learning radiomic analysis with an AUC of 0.87-0.96 [92,93]. Prediction of postoperative cerebral edema could be achieved using machine-based learning radiomic analysis and achieved an AUC of 0.8 in a validation cohort [94].…”
Section: Meningiomamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…AlKubeyyer et al [ 4 ] demonstrated that local binary pattern features from T2-weighted images yielded an AUC of 0.87 when coupled with a k-nearest neighbor classifier for meningioma tumor firmness prediction. In line with this, Zhai et al [ 23 ] validated a radiomics nomogram for predicting meningiomas consistency, based on a logistic regression classifier, which showed an AUC of 0.960 in the test cohort ( Figure 3 ).…”
Section: Tumor Consistencymentioning
confidence: 99%