1999
DOI: 10.1007/bf02513311
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Automatic detection of the electrocardiogram T-wave end

Abstract: Various methods for automatic electrocardiogram T-wave detection and Q-T interval assessment have been developed. Most of them use threshold level crossing. Comparisons with observer detection were performed due to the lack of objective measurement methods. This study followed the same approach. Observer assessments were performed on 43 various T-wave shapes recorded: (i) with 100 mm s-1 equivalent paper speed and 0.5 mV cm-1 sensitivity; and (ii) with 160 mm s-1 paper speed and vertical scaling ranging from 0… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
22
0
3

Year Published

2000
2000
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
22
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…The main reason may the computational feasibility with fewer errors in the parameters (TCRT/TMD) compared to other ECG parameters. One of the critical problems is in finding an accurate T-wave end for extracting other non-invasive ECG parameters for risk stratification [20,56], which is considered to be a major source of inaccuracy in automatic QT extracted measurements [48,52]. Proper identification of T-wave offset becomes a difficult task because of the slow transition of cardiac cells to the termination of the ventricular repolarization process, where accurate localization of the T-wave end point becomes a challenging task.…”
Section: Tcrt and Tmd Versus Other Noninvasive Risk Stratification Mementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The main reason may the computational feasibility with fewer errors in the parameters (TCRT/TMD) compared to other ECG parameters. One of the critical problems is in finding an accurate T-wave end for extracting other non-invasive ECG parameters for risk stratification [20,56], which is considered to be a major source of inaccuracy in automatic QT extracted measurements [48,52]. Proper identification of T-wave offset becomes a difficult task because of the slow transition of cardiac cells to the termination of the ventricular repolarization process, where accurate localization of the T-wave end point becomes a challenging task.…”
Section: Tcrt and Tmd Versus Other Noninvasive Risk Stratification Mementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Various methods have been proposed for detection of Tend point based on: intersection of lines [5], threshold on the amplitude of T wave [6], threshold on the first derivative of ECG signal [7], computation of: distances [8], angles [9] and areas [10], correlation with a template [11], mathematical models of ECG [12], and wavelet transform [13], among others methods. All have some advantages and some drawbacks in relation to complexity, computational cost, waveforms morphological variations, noise sensitivity and Tend dependence on threshold.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Classical segmentation methods are based on filtering the derivative of the ECG [22]- [25], on wavelet transform [26]- [30], or on an indicator related to the area covered by the T wave [31]. The major drawback of these methods lies in their sensitivity to noise.…”
Section: Estimation Of the Qt Intervalsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several algorithms for automated measurement have been proposed to locate QRS onsets and ends and QT interval limits. Classical segmentation methods are based on filtering the derivative of the ECG [22]- [25], or on wavelet transform [26]- [30]. The advantage of the methods based on derivative filtering lies in their robustness to variations in the morphology of the ECG waves.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%