Proceedings of the 53rd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics and the 7th International Joint Confere 2015
DOI: 10.3115/v1/p15-2099
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Automatic Detection of Sentence Fragments

Abstract: We present and evaluate a method for automatically detecting sentence fragments in English texts written by non-native speakers. Our method combines syntactic parse tree patterns and parts-of-speech information produced by a tagger to detect this phenomenon. When evaluated on a corpus of authentic learner texts, our best model achieved a precision of 0.84 and a recall of 0.62, a statistically significant improvement over baselines using non-parse features, as well as a popular grammar checker.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
(5 reference statements)
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This group of methods solves STC with consideration of context information. It includes a parsing-based classifier (PARPOS) that uses the parse tree patterns and POS tags as text features (Yeung and Lee 2015); a two-layer RNN+CNN network (TLRCN) that incorporates context information (Lee and Dernoncourt 2016); and the state-of-the-art STC solution (CNNDAC) that uses a hierarchical CNN+RNN model for dialog act classification (Liu, Han, and others 2017). • General Sequence Labelers.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This group of methods solves STC with consideration of context information. It includes a parsing-based classifier (PARPOS) that uses the parse tree patterns and POS tags as text features (Yeung and Lee 2015); a two-layer RNN+CNN network (TLRCN) that incorporates context information (Lee and Dernoncourt 2016); and the state-of-the-art STC solution (CNNDAC) that uses a hierarchical CNN+RNN model for dialog act classification (Liu, Han, and others 2017). • General Sequence Labelers.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…STC has been studied extensively within various NLP tasks with different text granularities, including part-of-speech (POS) tagging (Ratnaparkhi 1996), named entity recognition (NER) (Zhou and Su 2002), semantic roles labeling (SRL) (Gildea and Jurafsky 2002) and dialogue act tagging (Ji and Bilmes 2005). Some feature-based methods classify each fragment independently, i.e., each fragment is viewed as an individual text (Blatat, Mrakova, and Popelinsky 2004;Yeung and Lee 2015). However, this strategy relies on a set of handcrafted features and/or does not take into account the inherent dependencies across fragments.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%