2011
DOI: 10.1007/s10278-011-9421-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Automatic Detection of Pectoral Muscle Using Average Gradient and Shape Based Feature

Abstract: In medio-lateral oblique view of mammogram, pectoral muscle may sometimes affect the detection of breast cancer due to their similar characteristics with abnormal tissues. As a result pectoral muscle should be handled separately while detecting the breast cancer. In this paper, a novel approach for the detection of pectoral muscle using average gradient-and shape-based feature is proposed. The process first approximates the pectoral muscle boundary as a straight line using average gradient-, position-, and sha… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
44
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 51 publications
(44 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
44
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Another common performance measure pectoral muscle segmentation is the average rate of false positives (FP) and false negatives (FN) found in a segmentation. Both of these coefficients, as well as the average Hausdorff distance, for our method and the techniques suggested in [6], [7], [4], [8], and [5] are displayed in Table 3. We see that our method slightly outperforms the other techniques.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Another common performance measure pectoral muscle segmentation is the average rate of false positives (FP) and false negatives (FN) found in a segmentation. Both of these coefficients, as well as the average Hausdorff distance, for our method and the techniques suggested in [6], [7], [4], [8], and [5] are displayed in Table 3. We see that our method slightly outperforms the other techniques.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example Kwok et al [2] suggested Hough transform followed by cliff detection to progressively refine the obtained line into a curve that better fits the pectoral muscle boundary. In [4], the authors also detect the pectoral muscle initially as a straight line and then they look for local gradient maxima within a band enclosing it. Likewise, Kinoshita et al [5] approximated the pectoral muscle by the longest straight line in the Radon domain.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Intensity-based approaches are based on the fact that the intensity range of a pectoral muscle region should be higher than the range of breast parenchyma. These approaches directly utilize the pixel intensities [2][3][4][5][6][7], image histograms [8][9][10], and image gradients [11], or they are applied to image gradients [12]. Additionally, there are also some studies that segment pectoral muscles in wavelet domain instead of spatial domain [13][14][15].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Line-detection methods aim to determine the hypotenuse of this triangle. For this reason, straight line estimation [4,11,[16][17][18][19][20][21], Hough transform [14,22], and curve fitting [23] are used. The hypotenuse of the triangle pectoral muscle shows a curved structure rather than an exact line.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Under an assumption that the muscle boundary is a line/curve, the line/curve detection methods propose various methods to identify or simulate the line/curve. [27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34] The main difficulty in this kind of methods is that if the pectoral muscle boundary is obscure, a line approximation or curve fitting is also difficult to perform. The classification methods regard the pectoral muscle segmentation as a dichotomous classification problem, that is, each pixel in the mammograms is classified into the target set or the non-target set.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%