2018
DOI: 10.1002/mp.12746
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Automatic detection of multisize pulmonary nodules in CT images: Large‐scale validation of the false‐positive reduction step

Abstract: The authors conclude that the proposed CAD system can identify dissimilar nodule candidates in the multiple heterogeneous datasets. It could be considered as a useful tool to support radiologists during screening trials.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
21
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
1
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Nodules annotated by one or two radiologists, nodules of <3 mm diameter, and non-nodules of 3 mm diameter were defined as "irrelevant findings" and were not included as false-positives or true positives in the analysis. This approach was also used in prior studies (11,21).…”
Section: Internal Validation Using the Lidc-idri Datasetmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Nodules annotated by one or two radiologists, nodules of <3 mm diameter, and non-nodules of 3 mm diameter were defined as "irrelevant findings" and were not included as false-positives or true positives in the analysis. This approach was also used in prior studies (11,21).…”
Section: Internal Validation Using the Lidc-idri Datasetmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The mark annotated by the model is considered as a true positive if it is located within a distance r from the center of any nodule included in the reference standard, where r is set to the radius of the reference nodule (17). To compute the 95% confidence interval (CI), we performed bootstrapping 1000 times (11).…”
Section: Internal Validation Using the Lidc-idri Datasetmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The hand-craft features, e.g., spherical filter and local binary feature [26], are adopted by earlier lung nodule detectors [27]- [31], which achieve inferior performance compared with deep learning-based methods [5], [8], [11], [32]. Ding et al [11] employ a 2D Faster R-CNN as a nodule detector and use 3D CNN for false positive reduction, which achieves 89.1% average sensitivity.…”
Section: B Nodule Detection In 3d Medical Imagesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Khosravan and Bagci [8] design a 3D CNN with dense connection and propose adopting max-pooling throughout the network to achieve better performance. Another line of research [7], [10], [13], [32], [33] investigate multi-scale feature maps either in image or feature pyramid to cope with the variance of nodule size. All mentioned nodule detectors use anchors sampled uniformly over the spatial position as candidate nodules and classify each anchor to be a nodule or not as well as adjust their locations.…”
Section: B Nodule Detection In 3d Medical Imagesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…So far, most researches were based on one consolidated dataset. Gupta et al (Gupta et al, 2018) presented a two-stage approach for detection of multi-size pulmonary nodules in CT images from multiple heterogeneous datasets. The aim of the first stage was to initially extract different-sized nodule candidates by lung segmentation, morphological closing process, and rule-based thresholding algorithms.…”
Section: Backpropagation Neural Networkmentioning
confidence: 99%