2014 21th Iranian Conference on Biomedical Engineering (ICBME) 2014
DOI: 10.1109/icbme.2014.7043883
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Automatic detection of mitosis cell in breast cancer histopathology images using genetic algorithm

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, this method fails to demonstrate its robustness as region features used in the study may have significant variations among various datasets. Genetic algorithms for mitosis classification were proposed by Nateghi et al (2014). The authors used genetic optimization algorithms to eliminate potential non-mitosis from the histological image.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, this method fails to demonstrate its robustness as region features used in the study may have significant variations among various datasets. Genetic algorithms for mitosis classification were proposed by Nateghi et al (2014). The authors used genetic optimization algorithms to eliminate potential non-mitosis from the histological image.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The work has been extended in [25]. R. Nateghi et al, (2014) presents an automatic mitosis detection method using cast function and Genetic optimization algorithm. The segmented mitosis and non-mitosis cells were classified using the SVM classifier.…”
Section: Review Based On Conventional Techniquesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The segmented mitosis and non-mitosis cells were classified using the SVM classifier. They achieved F-score 78.47% [26]. In [27], statistical detection algorithms, i.e., constrained energy minimization, matched filtering and adaptive coherence estimator has been used for mitosis detection.…”
Section: Review Based On Conventional Techniquesmentioning
confidence: 99%