2020
DOI: 10.1109/jsen.2020.3002559
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Automatic Detection of Masses From Mammographic Images via Artificial Intelligence Techniques

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A comparison is also made with the algorithm of M. Hmida et al [28], where the algorithm was a hybrid between CVM and fuzzy cmeans, they dealt with 57 mammogram images of the class of masses only. N. A. N. Azlan et al [29], used normalization and filtration as a pre-processing before segmenting the image by the active contour method. The algorithms were implemented on all dataset images.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A comparison is also made with the algorithm of M. Hmida et al [28], where the algorithm was a hybrid between CVM and fuzzy cmeans, they dealt with 57 mammogram images of the class of masses only. N. A. N. Azlan et al [29], used normalization and filtration as a pre-processing before segmenting the image by the active contour method. The algorithms were implemented on all dataset images.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A mammogram image used in this study is drawn from different datasets, some of which are from the Mini–MIAS [ 5 , 9 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 ] and DDSM [ 12 ], while others are from BCDR [ 10 ]. We used the same images to evaluate their detection methods [ 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 9 , 10 , 12 ]. This dataset from DDSM, Mini–MIAS, and BCDR comprises 2620, 323, and 123 images, respectively.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Vaka et al [ 11 ] presented end–to–end testing for breast cancer detection using Deep Neural Network with Support Value (DNNSV). Azlan et al [ 12 ] proposed Principal Component Analysis (PCA) and SVM for breast cancer detection. Next, George et al [ 13 ] developed hybrid methods by combining the CNN and SVM on the Breast Cancer Histopathological Database (BreakHis).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An accuracy of 92% achieved using this approach. In (Azlan et al, 2020), authors used wavelet filters for image denoising, which is followed by image enhancement using the top and bottom hat technique. Snake boundary detectors are used for segmentation, followed by augmentation to enhance the dataset.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%