2014
DOI: 10.1117/12.2043872
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Automatic detection of invasive ductal carcinoma in whole slide images with convolutional neural networks

Abstract: This paper presents a deep learning approach for automatic detection and visual analysis of invasive ductal carcinoma (IDC) tissue regions in whole slide images (WSI) of breast cancer (BCa). Deep learning approaches are learn-from-data methods involving computational modeling of the learning process. This approach is similar to how human brain works using different interpretation levels or layers of most representative and useful features resulting into a hierarchical learned representation. These methods have… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

3
340
0
4

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 391 publications
(348 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
3
340
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…In supervised classification settings, a DNN uses the backpropagation algorithm to update its internal weights according to the label of input exemplars 12 . Some applications of the DNNs in histological image analysis include the mitosis identification task 13 and the localization of regions of interest in histological images 14 . With the recent emergence of whole slide tissue scanning and digital pathology [15][16][17] there has been substantial interest in developing automated computerized histologic predictors of tumor grade and outcome for several diseases including oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma 18 , prostate cancer 19,20 and glioblastoma 21 .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In supervised classification settings, a DNN uses the backpropagation algorithm to update its internal weights according to the label of input exemplars 12 . Some applications of the DNNs in histological image analysis include the mitosis identification task 13 and the localization of regions of interest in histological images 14 . With the recent emergence of whole slide tissue scanning and digital pathology [15][16][17] there has been substantial interest in developing automated computerized histologic predictors of tumor grade and outcome for several diseases including oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma 18 , prostate cancer 19,20 and glioblastoma 21 .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2, that is, automatically finding areas expressing IDBC within whole digital slides. Our approach most resembles a design recently proposed by Cruz-Roa et al 16 while additionally addressing two of the common weaknesses described in Sec. 1.2.…”
Section: Our Solutionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To further lower computational time, methods either sample a subset of the rectangular areas 12 or reduce the magnification level during analysis. 15,16 The former may be undesirable for clinical applications since the omitted areas may contain information that would ultimately affect tumor classification. Similarly, the latter technique may lead to a misinterpretation of the data due to the reduced magnification.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…13 Therefore, despite hand-crafted features, learned features do not need any preprocessing and can easily be transferred to different applications since they are data-driven. 15 These methods often outperform traditional approaches that use hand-crafted features. [16][17][18][19] Cruz-Roa et al 15 proposed a three-layer convolutional neural network (CNN) method for invasive ductal carcinoma detection in histopathology images of breast cancer and compared their method with hand-crafted features.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…15 These methods often outperform traditional approaches that use hand-crafted features. [16][17][18][19] Cruz-Roa et al 15 proposed a three-layer convolutional neural network (CNN) method for invasive ductal carcinoma detection in histopathology images of breast cancer and compared their method with hand-crafted features. They reported 6% improvement in the classification accuracy when using their CNN.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%