18th International Conference on Pattern Recognition (ICPR'06) 2006
DOI: 10.1109/icpr.2006.296
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Automatic Detection of Intestinal Juices in Wireless Capsule Video Endoscopy

Abstract: Wireless capsule video endoscopy is a novel and challenging clinical technique, whose major reported drawback relates to the high amount of time needed for video visualization. In this paper, we propose a method for the rejection of the parts of the video resulting not valid for analysis by means of automatic detection of intestinal juices. We applied Gabor filters for the characterization of the bubble-like shape of intestinal juices in fasting patients.Our method achieves a significant reduction in visualiza… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
32
0
1

Year Published

2008
2008
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 59 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
32
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The journey time is about eight hours and the stored data consists of approximately 50,000 frames. One of the most salient features of this technique relates to the lack of need of hospitalization or specialized stuff, overcoming most of the main drawbacks related to classical endoscopy [1]. On the other hand, the major weakness of the WCE is the requirement of significant diagnosing time (approximately 2 hours) and close concentration of an expert clinician, driving this clinical routine not feasible for certain clinical scenarios [2].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The journey time is about eight hours and the stored data consists of approximately 50,000 frames. One of the most salient features of this technique relates to the lack of need of hospitalization or specialized stuff, overcoming most of the main drawbacks related to classical endoscopy [1]. On the other hand, the major weakness of the WCE is the requirement of significant diagnosing time (approximately 2 hours) and close concentration of an expert clinician, driving this clinical routine not feasible for certain clinical scenarios [2].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, Vilarino et al [1] applied Gabor based texture feature to segment intestinal juices from WCE frames. However, the effects of residual foods, and faecal materials remain unexplored except bubble-patterns in the intestinal juices.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this effort, Gabor filters have been used to detect bubble like shape of intestinal juices [51], while color histograms together with a SVM classifier were being used to detect intestinal content [52]. A threestage cascade to detect informative frames has been proposed in [51].…”
Section: G Classifiers For Detection Of Non-informative Framesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Computational approaches coping with the analysis of the WCE video include the development of special annotation tools to auto-bookmark abnormalities [3]; classification approaches that perform tissue discrimination either between normal and abnormal regions [4] or between different organs [5][6][7]; synergistic methodologies such as image registration techniques and L-G graphs for the detection of abnormal patterns in WCE images [8]; clustering techniques for blood detection [9]; neural network techniques for classification or detection of abnormal patterns [10,16]; intestinal motility assessment methodologies [13,15]; and other approaches that aim either to image enhancement [12] or to the rejection of invalid parts of the WCE video by performing intestinal juice detection [14].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%