1997
DOI: 10.1001/archopht.1997.01100150727005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Automatic Detection of Glaucomatous Visual Field Progression With Neural Networks

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
26
0

Year Published

1999
1999
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
1
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Artificial neural networks have been successfully applied to interpret and classify visual fields, 13,14 detect visual field progression, 15 assess structural data from the optic nerve head, 16,17 and determine which machine-learning classifier Areas under the ROC curves (AUC), confidence intervals (CI), sensitivity, specificity, and likelihood ratios of artificial neural network and retinal nerve fiber layer parameters of OCT Spectralis to discriminate between normal and glaucoma subjects depending on the segmentation strategy.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Artificial neural networks have been successfully applied to interpret and classify visual fields, 13,14 detect visual field progression, 15 assess structural data from the optic nerve head, 16,17 and determine which machine-learning classifier Areas under the ROC curves (AUC), confidence intervals (CI), sensitivity, specificity, and likelihood ratios of artificial neural network and retinal nerve fiber layer parameters of OCT Spectralis to discriminate between normal and glaucoma subjects depending on the segmentation strategy.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This model could be used to classify longitudinal visual field data, which may prove valuable in monitoring visual field loss. Another early study evaluated 233 visual field series of patients with glaucoma experienced in automated perimetry to identify visual field progression with neural networks [88]. Agreement of three experienced observers was used as the "gold standard".…”
Section: Agreement Of Methods For Detection Of Visual Field Progressionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the study by Anton et al [16], the logistic discriminant analysis correctly identified the glaucomatous or non-glaucomatous defects, with a sensitivity of 65% to 85% and a specificity of 60% These results indicate the importance of ancillary data in glaucoma diagnosis. When used for automatic detection of glaucomatous visual field progression, the MLP neural network showed 73% sensitivity with 88% specificity, and a reasonably good agreement with the opinions of human experts [19]. Lietman et al [20] compared the glaucoma detection performance of a MLP network with that of ten other methods, including the global indices (e.g., mean deviation and corrected pattern standard deviation), methods to identify clusters of abnormal points, and cross-meridional algorithms.…”
Section: Computer-assisted Interpretation Of Visual Field Testmentioning
confidence: 96%