2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.bspc.2021.102916
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Automatic detection of epileptic seizure events using the time-frequency features and machine learning

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The main difference between EWT and DWT is that EWT decomposes the signal using adaptive frequency boundaries for each wavelet based on the information content, in contrast to DWT which uses fixed frequency bands [ 74 ]. In [ 75 , 76 ], experiments involving DWT and EWT have shown that the adaptivity of EWT slightly improves seizure detection since the DWT’s fixed filter band efficiency is limited. Although EWT showed a significant improvement, its performance was still restrained by noisy and highly non-stationary signals [ 77 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The main difference between EWT and DWT is that EWT decomposes the signal using adaptive frequency boundaries for each wavelet based on the information content, in contrast to DWT which uses fixed frequency bands [ 74 ]. In [ 75 , 76 ], experiments involving DWT and EWT have shown that the adaptivity of EWT slightly improves seizure detection since the DWT’s fixed filter band efficiency is limited. Although EWT showed a significant improvement, its performance was still restrained by noisy and highly non-stationary signals [ 77 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, the procedure may be required in some applications such as wearable devices where using a large number of channels is impractical [ 26 ]. Channel selection can be performed using different approaches, whether they are statistical approaches [ 11 , 22 , 36 , 62 , 75 , 76 , 113 ], data-driven approaches [ 14 , 88 , 116 , 117 , 118 ], wrapper approaches [ 119 ], or from prior knowledge based on previous studies [ 120 , 121 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…However, the pipeline method cannot consider the argument information when performing trigger word recognition, which affects the argument recognition, so a joint learning method is proposed. The joint learning method solves the cascading error of the pipeline method, and builds a joint learning model by identifying trigger words and arguments at the same time, so that the information of trigger words and arguments can mutually promote the extraction effect [ [12]]. Although the method of machine learning does not depend on the content and format of the corpus, it requires a large-scale standard corpus.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%