2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.jbi.2021.103955
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Automatic detection of COVID-19 vaccine misinformation with graph link prediction

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
(8 reference statements)
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The results of Step 2 of the method, aiming to scale up the discovery of framings on the entire Tweet collections discussing the vaccines, were evaluated using the following metrics: Precision ( ), Recall ( ) and -measure. computes the number of tweets correctly identified to evoke any framing, out of all tweets that the system reported in in (Weinzierl & Harabagiu, 2021 ) automatically pinpointed. measures how many tweets were identified by the system reported in in (Weinzierl & Harabagiu, 2021 ) to evoke a framing out all of the tweets that were judged to do so, and .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The results of Step 2 of the method, aiming to scale up the discovery of framings on the entire Tweet collections discussing the vaccines, were evaluated using the following metrics: Precision ( ), Recall ( ) and -measure. computes the number of tweets correctly identified to evoke any framing, out of all tweets that the system reported in in (Weinzierl & Harabagiu, 2021 ) automatically pinpointed. measures how many tweets were identified by the system reported in in (Weinzierl & Harabagiu, 2021 ) to evoke a framing out all of the tweets that were judged to do so, and .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… computes the number of tweets correctly identified to evoke any framing, out of all tweets that the system reported in in (Weinzierl & Harabagiu, 2021 ) automatically pinpointed. measures how many tweets were identified by the system reported in in (Weinzierl & Harabagiu, 2021 ) to evoke a framing out all of the tweets that were judged to do so, and . We measured 80.1%; 83.2%, and 81.6% when evaluating on the test collection for the HPV vaccine while 71.5%, 75.8%, and 73.6% when evaluated in the test collection for COVID-19 vaccines.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…This work focused on vaccine stance in general, but since the start of the COVID-19 pandemic vaccine stance classification has become almost inextricably linked to COVID-19 due to its societal relevance. An example is [22] who present CoV-axLies, a COVID-19 vaccine misinformation dataset, and demonstrate that their model, based on knowledge graphs, outperforms widely used classification methods for the detection of vaccine misinformation, an important cause of vaccine hesitancy.…”
Section: Related Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%