2009
DOI: 10.1121/1.3216913
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Automatic detection of articulation disorders in children with cleft lip and palate

Abstract: Speech of children with cleft lip and palate (CLP) is sometimes still disordered even after adequate surgical and nonsurgical therapies. Such speech shows complex articulation disorders, which are usually assessed perceptually, consuming time and manpower. Hence, there is a need for an easy to apply and reliable automatic method. To create a reference for an automatic system, speech data of 58 children with CLP were assessed perceptually by experienced speech therapists for characteristic phonetic disorders at… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
38
0
2

Year Published

2009
2009
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

3
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 62 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 58 publications
0
38
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The assessment result would then be more detailed, i.e., the reduction in intelligibility could then be related to the kind of the disorder. First results are presented in Maier et al (2008).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The assessment result would then be more detailed, i.e., the reduction in intelligibility could then be related to the kind of the disorder. First results are presented in Maier et al (2008).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This requires considerable time and labor, making such tools impractical for busy clinicians. Many authors have put substantial research effort in to automate the analysis for clinical assessment of disordered speech (Berisha et al, 2013;Bocklet et al, 2012;He et al, 2013;Lustyk et al, 2014;Maier et al, 2009;Middag et al, 2009;Zhou et al, 2012). Landmark (LM) analysis is a novel approach that characterizes speech with acoustic markers that are developed based on the LM theory of speech perception.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In previous investigations, ASR analysis and perceptually evaluated speech intelligibility showed agreement between 0.84 and 0.94 using Spearman rank correlation. The technique even allows for some more detailed analysis of altered speech: next to intelligibility assessment, even distinct alterations of phonetic features and of nasality in comparison to normal speech can be detected [38]. …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%