2012
DOI: 10.1109/tbme.2012.2190984
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Automatic Detection and Quantification of Tree-in-Bud (TIB) Opacities From CT Scans

Abstract: This study presents a novel computer-assisted detection (CAD) system for automatically detecting and precisely quantifying abnormal nodular branching opacities in chest computed tomography (CT), termed tree-in-bud (TIB) opacities by radiology literature. The developed CAD system in this study is based on 1) fast localization of candidate imaging patterns using local scale information of the images, and 2) Möobius invariant feature extraction method based on learned local shape and texture properties of TIB pat… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
23
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

4
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
(55 reference statements)
0
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Machine learning-based methods are useful for detecting and quantifying pathologic conditions; hence, these methods are considered to be the core part of the lung segmentation process as it examines every single voxel on the CT image and results in both lung and pathologic areas in the same framework (55)(56)(57)(58)(59). However, the main disadvantage of machine learning-based approaches is that depending on the complexity of the feature set, these approaches are computationally expensive and usually cannot model structural information (such as global shape or appearance information of the lungs) because only small patches are considered as features to be submitted into the classifiers.…”
Section: Machine Learning-based Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Machine learning-based methods are useful for detecting and quantifying pathologic conditions; hence, these methods are considered to be the core part of the lung segmentation process as it examines every single voxel on the CT image and results in both lung and pathologic areas in the same framework (55)(56)(57)(58)(59). However, the main disadvantage of machine learning-based approaches is that depending on the complexity of the feature set, these approaches are computationally expensive and usually cannot model structural information (such as global shape or appearance information of the lungs) because only small patches are considered as features to be submitted into the classifiers.…”
Section: Machine Learning-based Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Extracted features vary depending on the imaging modality and the body region. A number of feature sets for classification of lung pathologies have been proposed: 3D adaptive multiple feature method (AMFM) [24], texton-based approach [25], intensity-based features [26], gray level co-occurrence matrix (GLCM) [27], wavelet and Gabor transform [28], shape and context-based attributes [29], [30], local binary patterns (LBP) [31], and histogram of gradients (HOG) [29]. The most challenging aspect of these approaches is the selection of feature set appropriate for the task at hand, which is still an active area of research, however.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To the best of our knowledge, there is no systematic study exploring this longitudinal phenomena in human clinical trials yet. Based on our previous research [44-46] and some other works showing the imaging findings of pulmonary infections, there are certain similarities in image analysis of pre-clinical and clinical subjects. Consolidations and GGOs are the two main imaging patterns from CT images which are observed both in human subjects and small animals.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%