2018
DOI: 10.1089/dia.2017.0364
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Automatic Detection and Estimation of Unannounced Meals for Multivariable Artificial Pancreas System

Abstract: Integration of a meal detection module in an AP system is a further step toward an automated AP without manual entries. Detection of a consumed meal/snack and infusion of insulin boluses using an estimate of CHO enables the AP system to automatically prevent postprandial hyperglycemia.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
48
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 77 publications
(55 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
(37 reference statements)
1
48
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Meal detection is important in AP systems that do not permit manual meal announcements and as a safety system for patients who may forget to enter meal information manually. Turksoy et al have also investigated the development of a meal detection system based on analysis of CGM signals using an unscented Kalman filter and a fuzzy system to estimate the carbohydrates content [ 118 - 120 ]. Their approach was validated in silico with 30 T1D patients using the UVA/Padova simulator, which revealed a sensitivity of 91.3% and an error of 23.1% in carbohydrate estimation; and in vivo using data from 11 T1D patients, which revealed a sensitivity of 93.5% for meals and 68.0% for snacks.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Meal detection is important in AP systems that do not permit manual meal announcements and as a safety system for patients who may forget to enter meal information manually. Turksoy et al have also investigated the development of a meal detection system based on analysis of CGM signals using an unscented Kalman filter and a fuzzy system to estimate the carbohydrates content [ 118 - 120 ]. Their approach was validated in silico with 30 T1D patients using the UVA/Padova simulator, which revealed a sensitivity of 91.3% and an error of 23.1% in carbohydrate estimation; and in vivo using data from 11 T1D patients, which revealed a sensitivity of 93.5% for meals and 68.0% for snacks.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…VSD identified meal size 14 and has been applied to real-world data, 21 but it has significant delays and the meal size errors can lead to overestimates of insulin doses. Samadi et al 23 also identified meal size in real-world data, but with a high standard deviation in errors (28 g, roughly the amount of carbohydrates in a medium potato or banana). Further, that work evaluated meal size using the set of carbohydrate estimates within 2 hours of the start of the meal, making it difficult to compare results to methods that identify the meal and its quantity at the same time.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The adaptive and personalized PIC estimator is able to provide accurate estimates of the insulin present in the bloodstream for direct use in the control algorithm. The presented results are based on an MPC controller without incorporating any additional AP modules like the meal detection and carbohydrate estimation module that automatically recognizes carbohydrate consumption and suggests appropriate boluses [38,[47][48][49]. Such modules have the potential to further improve the closed-loop performance of the proposed PIC-cognizant MPC for use in safe and reliable AP systems.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%