International Conference on Signal Processing (ICSP 2016) 2016
DOI: 10.1049/cp.2016.1459
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Automatic detection and classification of tuberculosis bacilli from ZN-stained sputum smear images using watershed segmentation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
4
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…33,34 The sensitivity and specificity of this method for classifying a medium density background image as tuberculosis positive or negative were 100% and 93%, respectively, while for a high-density background the sensitivity remained unchanged, but specificity was reduced to 72% due to over-staining and artifacts. 33 Similarly, the sensitivity and specificity of this segmentation method for classifying a smartphone enabled microscopic images (medium to high-density background) as tuberculosis bacilli positive or negative were 93.3% and 87%, respectively. 34 The sensitivity, specificity, and precision rate of watershed segmentation on different infection levels (Scanty, 1+, 2+, and 3+) are depicted in Table 3.…”
Section: Bacilli Segmentation and Classificationmentioning
confidence: 94%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…33,34 The sensitivity and specificity of this method for classifying a medium density background image as tuberculosis positive or negative were 100% and 93%, respectively, while for a high-density background the sensitivity remained unchanged, but specificity was reduced to 72% due to over-staining and artifacts. 33 Similarly, the sensitivity and specificity of this segmentation method for classifying a smartphone enabled microscopic images (medium to high-density background) as tuberculosis bacilli positive or negative were 93.3% and 87%, respectively. 34 The sensitivity, specificity, and precision rate of watershed segmentation on different infection levels (Scanty, 1+, 2+, and 3+) are depicted in Table 3.…”
Section: Bacilli Segmentation and Classificationmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…The shape and size of the objects were determined to filter the true bacilli. 33 Similarly, the watershed algorithm was implemented on 30 randomly extracted images from the smartphone enabled microscope (MS-3) to segment bacilli. 34 In both studies, sensitivity and specificity of the watershed algorithm were calculated.…”
Section: Data Validationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Alguns slides podem ser difíceis de se analisar porque alguns componentes não bacterianos se assemelham às células Mtb [Zachariou et al 2022]. Dessa forma, a sensibilidade do resultado depende da experiência do especialista [Shah et al 2016]. Diante disso, a automatizac ¸ão da análise das imagens de lâminas para a detecc ¸ão e contagem dos bacilos pode auxiliar o bacteriologista no processo diagnóstico, tornando-o mais ágil, menos cansativo e menos propenso a erros.…”
Section: Introduc ¸ãOunclassified
“…Based on the table above, the success of the colour space method in detecting TB bacteria was able to identify two groups of High-Density Background and Low-Density Background images. While the watershed method can segment bacteria even though their positions are randomly distributed, this method has a sensitivity of 90.3% and a precision of 70% [4][5] [6][7] [8].So the watershed method will be tested with the colour space method in preprocessing and the watershed method in bacterial segmentation because the watershed method can be detection random object and identification object.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%