2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2016.01.025
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Automatic cytoplasm and nuclei segmentation for color cervical smear image using an efficient gap-search MRF

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
24
0
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 57 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
24
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Along with other robust refinement methods, supervised and unsupervised methods were used to distinguish image patches or superpixels from extracted elements, such as Adaboost detectors [27], support vector machine (SVM) [28] or Gauussian mixture models [29]. In a study by Zhao et al [30] a novel superpixel-based Markov random field (MRF) segmentation was also implemented for non-overlapping cells.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Along with other robust refinement methods, supervised and unsupervised methods were used to distinguish image patches or superpixels from extracted elements, such as Adaboost detectors [27], support vector machine (SVM) [28] or Gauussian mixture models [29]. In a study by Zhao et al [30] a novel superpixel-based Markov random field (MRF) segmentation was also implemented for non-overlapping cells.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cytoplasm DSC: 0.914. In one other study, Zhao et al 2016 [30] used an MRF classifier with a Gap-search algorithm + Automatic labeling map. The findings revealed that Nuclei DSC: 0.93.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As described in [11], there exists substantial difference between abnormal and normal nuclei in shape and size. We thus separate the nuclei class into abnormal (small) and normal (large) classes, resulting in four classes for D-MEM training Method ZSI Precision Recall Unsupervised [15] 0.89±0.15 0.88±0.15 0.93±0.15 FCM [16] 0.80±0.24 0.85±0.21 0.83±0.25 P-MRF [17] 0.93±0.03 − − SP-CNN [18] 0.90 0.89 0.91 Our Method 0.933±0.14 0.946±0.06 0.984±0.00 Table 1. Comparison of the state-of-the-art methods and proposed method and predicting.…”
Section: Model Training and Predictingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nosrati and Hamarneh [6] used MSER combined with Random Decision Forest. Further, a framework for detecting the nuclei of cells based on Markov Random Field (MRF) was proposed by Zhao et al [11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%