2017 Chinese Automation Congress (CAC) 2017
DOI: 10.1109/cac.2017.8243654
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Automatic crack inspection for concrete bridge bottom surfaces based on machine vision

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Many crack detection algorithms based on deep learning have been recently proposed. Zhang et al [23] designed a framework that can be directly applied to the original crack image for automatic feature extraction and classification, and the framework achieved superior performance compared to traditional handcrafted methods. Pauly et al [24] improved classification accuracy and recognition by adopting a deeper neural network to classify crack and non-crack patches.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many crack detection algorithms based on deep learning have been recently proposed. Zhang et al [23] designed a framework that can be directly applied to the original crack image for automatic feature extraction and classification, and the framework achieved superior performance compared to traditional handcrafted methods. Pauly et al [24] improved classification accuracy and recognition by adopting a deeper neural network to classify crack and non-crack patches.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, the traditional region-proposal methods are inefficient in selecting good candidate regions from the noisy images (Uijlings et al , 2013). To improve the computation efficacy of region-based methods, Zhang et al (2017a) applied parallel processing; however, the computation and resource costs were expensive.…”
Section: Crack Detection-based Deep Learning: a Conceptual Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is required to capture the speckle pattern before and after the deformation and the results are sensitive to the relative locations of the cameras and objects, which is not applicable to the structural inspection. Some researchers have developed robotic or vehicular visual inspection systems to acquire surface pictures of bridges and tunnels, improving the efficiency of the process in terms of time consumption, cost, and safety (Huang et al., 2017; Jiang et al., 2019; Prasanna et al., 2016; H. Zhang et al., 2017). The detailed features of cracks, such as width, length, and orientation, are critical for the cracking analysis and health evaluation of infrastructures (Gribniak et al., 2016; Jiang et al., 2019).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Conventional image‐segmentation algorithms for crack identification are based on a gray threshold (Dinh et al., 2016; Fujita & Hamamoto, 2011; Talab et al., 2016), edge detection (Abdel‐Qader et al., 2003; Canny, 1986; H. Zhang et al., 2017), and mathematical morphology (Lee et al., 2013; Yun et al., 2015). However, the performance of these methods depends on the preprocessing of the images and is sensitive to crack‐like artifacts, such as dust, shadows, and marks.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%