2020
DOI: 10.1007/s40593-020-00207-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Automatic Concept Extraction for Domain and Student Modeling in Adaptive Textbooks

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These approaches are not directly applicable to our problem setting since we require short phrases focusing on the performance of an action by the user. Approaches such as TextRank (Kazemi et al, 2020), SingleRank (Wan and Xiao, 2008), Ex-pandRank (Wan and Xiao, 2008), TopicRank (Bougouin et al, 2013), TopicalPageRank (Sterckx et al, 2015), PositionRank (Florescu and Caragea, 2017), Bi-LSTM-CRF Sequence Labeling (Alzaidy et al, 2019), FACE (Chau et al, 2020), and Mul-tipartiteRank (Boudin, 2018) have been applied to the task of key phrase extraction from documents as opposed to theme detection from clusters. For cluster-labeling, there has been work around using keyword extraction from clusters, utilizing WordNet synsets to expand the keywords, followed by a selection procedure to assign the final label (Poostchi and Piccardi, 2018;Chang and McKeown, 2019).…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These approaches are not directly applicable to our problem setting since we require short phrases focusing on the performance of an action by the user. Approaches such as TextRank (Kazemi et al, 2020), SingleRank (Wan and Xiao, 2008), Ex-pandRank (Wan and Xiao, 2008), TopicRank (Bougouin et al, 2013), TopicalPageRank (Sterckx et al, 2015), PositionRank (Florescu and Caragea, 2017), Bi-LSTM-CRF Sequence Labeling (Alzaidy et al, 2019), FACE (Chau et al, 2020), and Mul-tipartiteRank (Boudin, 2018) have been applied to the task of key phrase extraction from documents as opposed to theme detection from clusters. For cluster-labeling, there has been work around using keyword extraction from clusters, utilizing WordNet synsets to expand the keywords, followed by a selection procedure to assign the final label (Poostchi and Piccardi, 2018;Chang and McKeown, 2019).…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Extracting KCs from textbooks has been explored before for the domain of information retrieval. For instance, Chau and colleagues (Chau et al 2020) adopted a supervised machine learning approach based on a set of expert-defined features. The features they used fall into three broad categories: linguistic, positional, or statistical.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All ngrams (n = 1...4) are considered candidate keyphrases. We used this n-gram range for extracting candidate key concepts based on a quick analysis of the textbook by ourselves as well as based on literature, e.g., Chau and colleagues (Chau et al 2020) define domain concepts as "single words or short phrases of two to four words." The candidate n-grams contain stop words and punctuation marks.…”
Section: Candidate Concept Generationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…There are designs of models of affective users that consider the emotional states of the student, that is, that allow the probabilistic combination of information about the causes and effects of emotional reactions (Conati & Maclaren, 2009). Also, the creation of a domain model is fundamental in an adaptive hypermedia system, since it de nes the relationships between concepts within an adaptive educational environment (Chau, Labutov, Thaker, He, & Brusilovsky, 2020). The domain model must guarantee the presentation of these contents in various formats, considering the different presentation styles of the domain model; all these elements will contribute to the success of the experience (Howlin & Lynch, 2014).…”
Section: Related Wordsmentioning
confidence: 99%